SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 855

SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
X – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Pratik Dhar, Chittapriya Ghosh.

JUDGMENT :

SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the father of an unfortunate minor girl of 11 years who is studying in Class V.

2. The minor was a victim of a gang rape, which invited proceedings under Section 376DB of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and under Section 6(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “the POCSO Act”).

3. The minor, as of today, is pregnant for about 25 weeks and 6 days.

4. The pregnancy was a result of the atrocity committed on the minor victim.

5. The father of the minor, on her behalf, seeks medical termination of the unwanted and unwarranted pregnancy, in view of the trauma which would be suffered by the minor in the circumstances, if the birth of the child goes through.

6. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner cites Sections 3 and 5 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1971 Rules”) as well as the connected Rules of 2003. It is contended that although under Section 3(2)(b), the outer length of pregnancy which can be medically terminated under the Act is 24 weeks. The Act has to be taken as a whole. Explanation 2 of Section 3(2)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top