Back
TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, SUGATO MAJUMDAR
Beauty Panja – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, Eastern Railway – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sugato Majumdar, J.) :
1. The instant writ petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 31.12.2013 passed in OA No. 551 of 2012 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta Bench.
2. In order to consider the question as to whether the order suffers from any infirmity requiring our interference, it may be just and proper to notice the relevant facts.
3. On 26/08/2005, while the petitioner was working in the post of Matron in Howrah Orthopedic Hospital, Eastern Railway, she was harassed and mentally tortured by the Chief Matron, namely, Smt. Sadhana Roy (in short, Sadhana) and such fact was duly reported to the authorities. On the same date Sadhana also lodged a complaint to the Officer-in-Charge, Howrah Police Station alleging inter alia that she had been assaulted by the petitioner. On the same day, another joint petition was also submitted by sixty two staff of the Howrah Orthopedic Hospital, Eastern Railway against the petitioner alleging misbehavior. She was placed under suspension on 26/08/2005 itself. The suspension order was subsequently revoked by the respondent no.4 vide memo dated 24/01/2006. The petitioner was thereafter issued a charge she
Unexplained delay in disciplinary proceedings may indicate bias and prejudice, and procedural irregularities can render the entire proceeding non est in the eye of law.
The court established that an employee must be given a chance to respond to an enquiry officer's findings before a disciplinary authority makes a decision, as a matter of natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for an independent and impartial Enquiry Officer, the observance of natural justice, and the appointment of a Presenting Officer in....
The principles of natural justice, including the right to be heard and the right to a fair and impartial hearing, must be adhered to in disciplinary proceedings against government employees.
The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner, affirming that the inquiry was conducted fairly and in accordance with legal principles, with no grounds for interference.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
