SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Saiful Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Fortaj Sk. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred against an order dated 17.10.2019 passed by the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna in G.R. Case No. 272/2004 arising out of P.S. Case No. 60/04 dated 27.05.2004 under Sections 326/34 of I.P.C.
2. The petitioners state that one Sk. Rasidul filed a written complaint before the Officer-in-Charge Monteswer at 1 p.m. on 27.05.2004. After receiving the alleged complaint, the Officer-in-Charge started Monteswar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2004 dated 27.05.2004 under Sections 326/34 I.P.C. The investigation resulted in a final report (FRT).
3. Vide order dated 19.04.2005 upon hearing the ‘Naraji’ petition, the Learned S.D.J.M. directed S.P. Burdwan for reinvestigation in the above case.
4. The reinvestigation ended in a charge sheet but the trial has not been concluded till date.
5. After completion of the examination all of the prosecution witness and examination of the petitioners under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, the case was fixed for argument.
6. The petitioner states that after a long gap, the opposite party has filed an application under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C.
7. The Learned Jud
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.