SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Arpita Pal – Appellant
Versus
Sushil Chandra Pal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revisional application has been preferred praying for quashing of proceedings in Complaint Case No. 207 of 2017 dated under Sections 504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 pending before the Learned 4th Judicial Magistrate at Barasat.
FACTS:-
2. The petitioner No. 1 is the daughter in law of the opposite party. The other petitioners are her parents and other family members.
3. The petitioner no. 1 states that she was compelled to live in her parental house “due to several cruel treatments by the persons of her matrimonial house”. A case being Rishra Police Station case no. 34 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 filed by the petitioner no. 1 is pending before Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Shreerampore.
4. The allegations against the petitioners in short are that the petitioner no. 1 use to call the son of complainant and threaten him with dire consequences and also use filthy language.
5. The petitioners state that the complainant and his son instituted two different cases on similar cause of action, one is Special No. 222 of 2018 corresponding to Complaint Case No. 460 of 2017 dated under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.