IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR, JJ.
The State of West Bengal & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Subha Prasad Nandi Majumdar & Ors. - Respondents
MAT No. 1762 of 2023, CAN No. 1 of 2023, CAN No. 2 of 2023 with MAT No. 1705 of 2023
Decided On : 13-12-2023
Retirement Age Extension - Interpretation of State-aided University or College - West Bengal Universities (Control of Expenditure) Act, 1976 - Section 4 - Memorandum dated 24th February, 2021
Fact of the Case:
The case involves a dispute over the extension of the retirement age of a teaching staff member at a university, based on a notification dated 24th February, 2021.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was not entitled to the benefit of the notification dated 24th February, 2021, as the word 'any' in the notification should be interpreted in a restrictive manner, limited to State-aided Universities or Colleges within the geographical confines of West Bengal.
Issues: The main issue was whether the service rendered by the petitioner at a college in Assam should be considered for the retirement age extension benefit under the said memorandum.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the word 'any' in the notification dated 24th February, 2021 in conjunction with the definitions of State-aided University and Government-aided College in the West Bengal Universities (Control of Expenditure) Act, 1976, and concluded that the benefit of the legislation is only applicable to teachers and employees in colleges or universities receiving aid from the State of West Bengal.
Final Decision: The court set aside the order in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to the benefit of the notification dated 24th February, 2021.
JUDGMENT :
Soumen Sen, J.
1. Both the appeals involving similar question of law and fact, are taken up together and disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The respondents in the writ petition have filed separate appeals arising out of the order dated 28th August, 2023.
3. The question involved in the writ petition is with regard to the extension of the age of retirement of the petitioner in terms of a notification dated 24th February, 2021.
4. Subha Prasad Nandi Majumdar, the writ petitioner in WPA 16596 of 2023 hereinafter referred to as the “writ petitioner” was appointed as a teaching staff at Cachar College Silchar which was subsequently converted into a Government College by a statutory notification.
5. He served the said college for about 16 years. He was selected for the post of the Secretary, Faculty Council for post-Graduate Studies in Science at Burdwan University on 5th November, 2007. He was promoted to the post of Senior Secretary, Faculty Council for Post-Graduate Studies in Science with effect from 26th January, 2012.
6. The Registrar of Burdwan University by the impugned notice dated 28th June, 2003 informed the petitioner that he would retire from the service of the University on 31st August, 2023 on completion of 60 years of age.
7. The writ petitioner challenged the impugned notice dated 28th June, 2003 on the ground that in terms of the notification dated 24th February, 2021 the retirement age for the relevant post was enhanced to 65 years.
8. The learned Single Judge accepted the contention of the writ petitioner and allowed the writ petition. This order has been challenged by the State and the Burdwan University.
9. Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the University/appellant has submitted that the writ petitioner is not entitled the benefit of the notification dated 24th February, 2021 as he lacks teaching experience in a State-aided University or College in West Bengal. The past Service rendered by the writ petitioner at Cachar College is irrelevant and not covered by the notification dated 24th February, 2021. The service rendered at Cachar was not a criteria for appointment of the writ petitioner to the post of Secretary, Faculty Council for Post Graduate Studies in Science under the University.
10. Mr. Nag has referred to a notification dated 13th June, 2003 issued by the assistant Secretary of the department of Higher Education in which the State has clarified that a State-aided University or College teacher who joined the University Service from the other State would not come within the purview of the notification dated 24th February, 2021 since the expression “State-aided University or College” contained therein applies only to any University/College aided by the Government of West Bengal. This qualification has not been properly considered by the learned Single Judge while interpreting the government Order dated 24th February, 2021.
11. Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, the learned Counsel appearing for the State has referred to the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the State. Mr. Mallick has principally supported the interpretation of the expression State-aided University or College put forth by Mr. Nag.
12. Mr. Mallick has referred to paragraph 4 sub paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 of the affidavit-in-opposition to show that various States in India have different ages to superannuation of teaching staff in University and Colleges.
13. Mr. Mallick wants the court to read the expression “any State-aided University or College” mentioned in the Memorandum dated 24th February, 2021 in the light of the aforesaid fact.
14. Mr. Mallick submits that the aforesaid expression shall mean and can only mean colleges and universities in the State of West Bengal.
15. Per contra Mr. Saptansu Basu learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner has submitted that he was appointed to the said post after taking into account his past service as a teaching staff at Cachar College and therefore the w
AI
The interpretation of the word 'any' in legal provisions should be context-specific and should be read in conjunction with related definitions and statutes.
Exclusion of teaching experience from outside the State for retirement age extension violates equality principles and lacks a rational basis.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding nature of previous court decisions in similar cases, the finality of decisions made by the Hon’ble Division Bench and Co-ordinate Bench....
increasing the age of superannuation only in the case of Professors, there is no violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as alleged, for the simple reason that whereas equals cannot be ....
The court established that a Senior Research Officer is classified as a Teacher under the university's statutes, entitled to benefits of extended service age.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.