Back
TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE
AI Champdany Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, J.
1. The present appeal has been preferred by AI Champdany Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company) and its functionary challenging an order dated 31st January, 2018 passed in a writ petition being W.P. 2319 (W) of 2016 refusing to interfere with the orders dated 8th July, 2015 and 19th /20th November, 2015 passed by the Under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Textiles pursuant to the order dated 6th May, 2015 passed in a writ petition being W.P. 5365 (W) of 2010.
2. The appellants preferred the writ petition being W.P. 2319 (W) of 2016 stating inter-alia that the respondent no. 1 (hereinafter referred to as UOI) with effect from 8th February, 1989 introduced the External Market Assistance Scheme (hereinafter referred to as ‘the EMA scheme’) with the basic object of boosting exports of jute goods from India. Under the EMA Scheme, market assistance is provided at a specified rate on export of specified jute products. The EMA scheme since its inception has got extension and has undergone modification from time to time and was valid till 31st March, 2007. By a notification dated 25th September, 1998, food grade jute pr
The judgment underscores the significance of adherence to the EMA scheme guidelines and the importance of proper certification in claiming benefits under the scheme.
The court established that interest claims do not fall under the penalty provisions of the FT Act, thus cannot be adjudicated by the authority designated under the Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the eligibility criteria and key legal provisions under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019, to determine the petitioner's entitle....
The court held that claims involving CENVAT credits were extinguished post-approval of the resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, reaffirming jurisdictional limits of the High Cour....
Blacklisting has the effect of denying a person or an entity the privileged opportunity of entering into government contracts. This privilege arises because it is the State who is the counter party i....
An order passed by an authority without giving notice and opportunity of hearing to the affected parties is in violation of the principles of natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
