Back
TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Soumendu Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
Abu Sohel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint origins and initial legal remedies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the allegations made against the accused. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. argument regarding procedural compliance in filing complaints. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. complaint handling and subsequent court actions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court observations on investigation protocols. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. court's view on the necessity of pre-investigation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. discussion of political implications and motivations behind complaint. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. evaluation and implications of assessing the evidence and allegations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. final court decision quashing f.i.r. and directing further inquiry. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 10. order for the district magistrate to collect evidence for further action. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 11. administrative directives to proceed with records. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT :
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
The present revisional application has been preferred challenging the order dated 17.02.2022 passed by the learned A.C.J.M., Contai in M.P. Case No.60 of 2022 wherein the learned Magistrate was pleased to allow the prayer of the opposite party no.1 under Section 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
