SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 908

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.
Setara Begam – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A. 22281 of 2022, C.A.N. 3 of 2023, W.P.A. 1098 of 2024, W.P.A. 1101 of 2024, W.P.A. 1217 of 2024, W.P.A. 22283 of 2022, C.A.N. 2 of 2023, W.P.A. 23432 of 2023, W.P.A. 23435 of 2023, W.P.A. 23441 of 2023, W.P.A. 4615 of 2024, W.P.A. 6466 of 2024, W.P.A. 6470 of 2024
Decided on : 02-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy, Advocate, Mr. Pingal Bhattacharya, Advocate, Mr. Subhankar Das, Advocate, Mr. Shamit Sanyal, Advocate, Ms. Priyakshi Banerjee, Advocate, Mr. Sabyasachi Roy, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, Ld. AGP, Ms. Amrita Panja Moulick, Advocate, Mr. Suman Sengupta, Advocate, Mr. Amritalal Chatterjee, Advocate, Mr. Dwaipayan Basu Mallick, Advocate, Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Advocate, Mr. Ritesh Kr. Ganguly, Advocate, Mr. Kalyan Kumar Bandyopadhyay, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ramesh Dhara, Advocate, Ms. Mousumi Chowdhury, Advocate

The State Control Order, 2013 remains effective and is not rendered redundant by the NFSA, 2013 or TPDS Control Order, 2015 until full implementation of the NFSA is established.

Headnote:(A) Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 5 - National Food Security Act, 2013 - Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2015 - The court determined the redundancy of State Control Order, 2013 post-introduction of TPDS Control Order, 2015, holding that unless NFSA is fully implemented, the State Control Order remains operative. (Para 51)

Facts of the case:
The dispute arose regarding the status and applicability of the West Bengal State Control Order, 2013 in light of the promulgation of the NFSA, 2013 and the TPDS Control Order, 2015, with the petitioners arguing that the State Control Order had become redundant; however, the State claimed sections of the NFSA had not been fully implemented. (Para 1, 50)

Findings of Court:
The court concluded the State Control Order, 2013 is not redundant as the NFSA, 2013 has not been fully implanted in West Bengal, allowing the continued operation of the State Order until such implementation occurs. (Paras 51, 52)

Issues: (i) The status and nature of the State Control Order, 2013 as a delegated legislation. (ii) The impact of the NFSA's non-implementation on the relevance of Central Control Order, 2001. (iii) The challenge to the effectiveness of the State Order in the absence of a direct prayer against its vires. (Para 8)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Central Control Order, 2001 continues to apply as the NFSA, 2013 has not been fully enacted in West Bengal, maintaining the validity of the State Control Order, 2013 based on the direct delegation from the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. (Para 51)

Result: Writ petitions dismissed. (Para 52)

Table of Content
1. issue of redundancy of state control order. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding legislative powers and implementation statuses. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. evaluation of redundancy of the state control order after the introduction of tpds. (Para 3)
4. understanding of supersession concerning legislative provisions. (Para 18 , 21 , 40)
5. discussion on delegated powers and their legislative implications. (Para 20)
6. court's observations about the effectiveness of state control order. (Para 24 , 26)
7. determination of effectiveness and applicability of existing control orders. (Para 30)
8. dismissal of writ petitions based on legality of state control order. (Para 52)

JUDGMENT :

Bivas Pattanayak, J.

1. The sole issue raised in the present writ petitions is whether with the promulgation of National Food Security Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘NFSA, 2013’) and Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2015 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘TPDS Control Order, 2015’) of the Central Government, the West Bengal Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Control Order, 2013’) has become redundant.

2. Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy, learned advocate for the petitioners in W.P.A. 22281 of 2022, W.P.A. 1098 of 2024, W.P.A. 1101 of 2024, W.P.A. 1217 of 2024, W.P.A. 22283 of 2022, W.P.A. 4615 of 2024, W.P.A. 6466 of 2024 and WPA 6470 of 2024 submitted that Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1955’) empowers the Central Government to make rule/order for maintaining, controlling, monitoring, licensing so far as essential commodities are concerned. Section 5 of the Act of 1955 empowers the Central Government to delegate power to the State Government to frame rule/order for exercising power under Section 3 of the Act of 1955 by issuing orders in relation to such matters. The Central Government in exercise of power under Section 3 of the Act of 1955 issued Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Central Control Order, 2001’) on 31st August, 2001 specifying the terms and conditions to be followed by the respective States in framing of rules for maintaining, controlling, monitoring, licensing of Public Distribution System. The State Government in exercise of power under Section 3 of the Act of 1955 read with Central Control Order, 2001 framed two Control Orders namely (i) West Bengal Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013 on 8th August 2013 applicable for rural areas throughout the State of West Bengal and (ii) West Bengal Urban Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013 on 12th August 2013 applicable for urban areas throughout the State of West Bengal. Needless to mention that the State Control Order, 2013 has been issued pursuant to the delegation given by the Central Government under Clause 7 of the Central Control Order, 2001. The Central Government, after 66 years of independence in order to ensure access to adequate quantity of quality food at affordable prices to its people, enacted NFSA, 2013 on 10th September, 2013 and for implementation of NFSA, 2013, it introduced TPDS Control Order, 2015 superseding the earlier Central Control Order, 2001, targeting a particular section of the society for providing them with food at affordable price. With the supersession of Central Control Order, 2001 by coming into force of TPDS Control Order, 2015, the State Control Order, 2013 loses its force and becomes redundant. The legality of the scheme of Duare ration i.e. doorstep delivery of foodgrains to the beneficiaries was under challenge at the instance of Fair Price Shop owners in FMA 764 of 2022 (Sekh Abdul Majed versus State of West Bengal & Ors.) with MAT 910 of 2022 (Sk. Manowar Ali & Ors. versus State of West Bengal & Ors.). In the aforesaid appeals, submissions were made by learned Advocate General of the State of West

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top