IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.
Setara Begam – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A. 22281 of 2022, C.A.N. 3 of 2023, W.P.A. 1098 of 2024, W.P.A. 1101 of 2024, W.P.A. 1217 of 2024, W.P.A. 22283 of 2022, C.A.N. 2 of 2023, W.P.A. 23432 of 2023, W.P.A. 23435 of 2023, W.P.A. 23441 of 2023, W.P.A. 4615 of 2024, W.P.A. 6466 of 2024, W.P.A. 6470 of 2024
Decided on : 02-08-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issue of redundancy of state control order. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding legislative powers and implementation statuses. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. evaluation of redundancy of the state control order after the introduction of tpds. (Para 3) |
| 4. understanding of supersession concerning legislative provisions. (Para 18 , 21 , 40) |
| 5. discussion on delegated powers and their legislative implications. (Para 20) |
| 6. court's observations about the effectiveness of state control order. (Para 24 , 26) |
| 7. determination of effectiveness and applicability of existing control orders. (Para 30) |
| 8. dismissal of writ petitions based on legality of state control order. (Para 52) |
JUDGMENT :
Bivas Pattanayak, J.
1. The sole issue raised in the present writ petitions is whether with the promulgation of National Food Security Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘NFSA, 2013’) and Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2015 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘TPDS Control Order, 2015’) of the Central Government, the West Bengal Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Control Order, 2013’) has become redundant.
2. Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy, learned advocate for the petitioners in W.P.A. 22281 of 2022, W.P.A. 1098 of 2024, W.P.A. 1101 of 2024, W.P.A. 1217 of 2024, W.P.A. 22283 of 2022, W.P.A. 4615 of 2024, W.P.A. 6466 of 2024 and WPA 6470 of 2024 submitted that Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1955’) empowers the Central Government to make rule/order for maintaining, controlling, monitoring, licensing so far as essential commodities are concerned. Section 5 of the Act of 1955 empowers the Central Government to delegate power to the State Government to frame rule/order for exercising power under Section 3 of the Act of 1955 by issuing orders in relation to such matters. The Central Government in exercise of power under Section 3 of the Act of 1955 issued Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Central Control Order, 2001’) on 31st August, 2001 specifying the terms and conditions to be followed by the respective States in framing of rules for maintaining, controlling, monitoring, licensing of Public Distribution System. The State Government in exercise of power under Section 3 of the Act of 1955 read with Central Control Order, 2001 framed two Control Orders namely (i) West Bengal Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013 on 8th August 2013 applicable for rural areas throughout the State of West Bengal and (ii) West Bengal Urban Public Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013 on 12th August 2013 applicable for urban areas throughout the State of West Bengal. Needless to mention that the State Control Order, 2013 has been issued pursuant to the delegation given by the Central Government under Clause 7 of the Central Control Order, 2001. The Central Government, after 66 years of independence in order to ensure access to adequate quantity of quality food at affordable prices to its people, enacted NFSA, 2013 on 10th September, 2013 and for implementation of NFSA, 2013, it introduced TPDS Control Order, 2015 superseding the earlier Central Control Order, 2001, targeting a particular section of the society for providing them with food at affordable price. With the supersession of Central Control Order, 2001 by coming into force of TPDS Control Order, 2015, the State Control Order, 2013 loses its force and becomes redundant. The legality of the scheme of Duare ration i.e. doorstep delivery of foodgrains to the beneficiaries was under challenge at the instance of Fair Price Shop owners in FMA 764 of 2022 (Sekh Abdul Majed versus State of West Bengal & Ors.) with MAT 910 of 2022 (Sk. Manowar Ali & Ors. versus State of West Bengal & Ors.). In the aforesaid appeals, submissions were made by learned Advocate General of the State of West
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan versus State of Maharashtra and Others
Bhimandas Ambwani (Dead) Through LRs. versus Delhi Power Company Limited
Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of W.B. & Ors.
District Collector and Another versus B. Suresh and Others
Gajraj Singh versus State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Others
M.S. Jayaraj versus Commissioner of Excise, Kerala & Ors.
Mani Subrat Jain and Others versus State of Haryana
Prabhat Pan and Others versus The State of West Bengal and Others
Rajendra Singh v. State of M.P.
Saghir Ahmad & Anr. v. State of U.P.
Sai Chalchitra versus Commissioner, Merrut and Others
Shanti Kumar R. Chanji v. Home Insurance Co. of New York
Sm. Lila Biswas versus State of West Bengal & Ors
State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta
State of Punjab versus Harnek Singh
State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
State of Tamil Nadu versus M/s. Hind Stone and Others
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare Assn. (2) v. S.C. Sekar & Ors.
The Nagar Rice & Flour Mills and Others versus N. Teekappa Gowda and Bros. and Others
The court emphasized that the appellants had no legal right to challenge the State's policy decision, as it was taken at the top level of the administrative hierarchy and implemented through the subs....
An association can challenge the validity of legislation affecting its members, as it constitutes an injury to its collective rights. The court affirmed that procedural rights must adhere to principl....
A repeal of a Control Order extinguishes existing rights to selection processes under it, establishing that vested rights only arise upon completion of licensing.
The court upheld the classification in the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, justifying the exclusion of private individuals from running fair price shops due to historical malpractices, wh....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.