SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1106

UDAY UMESH LALIT, BELA M. TRIVEDI
GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MAHAKALI FOODS PVT. LTD. (UNIT 2) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AOR Ms. Aspi Kapadia, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, AOR Mr. Vikrant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Mr. Satya Kam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Ms. Deb Deepa Majumdar, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mutyalwar, Adv. Mr. Gajanan Tirthkar, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv. Mr. Bhargav Pandya, Adv. Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv. Ms. Gwen Karthika, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Atun Y Chitale, Sr. Adv. Ms. Tanvi Kakar, Adv. Ms. Suchitra Atul Chitale, AOR Mr. Nakul Dewan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sambit Nanda, Adv. Ms. Anuska Shah, Adv. Ms. Smriti Kalra, Adv. Mr. Muddam Thirupathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nakul Dewan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, AOR Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, Adv. Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Mr. Risvi Muhammad, Adv. Mr. Durgesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, AOR Mr. Abhishek Singh, AOR Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR M/s. Udit Kishan & Associates, AOR M/s. Meharia & Company, AOR Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, AOR

Table of Content
1. leave to appeal is granted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. overview of common questions in appeals. (Para 3)
3. substantive legal issues identified. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. arguments presented by buyers and suppliers. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. interpretation of overriding provisions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
6. msmed act prevails: context of arbitration. (Para 22 , 23)
7. msmed act’s provisions and their application. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. no preclusion from utilizing the msmed act. (Para 34)
9. final conclusions based on appeals. (Para 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT

1. Leave to appeal is granted in SLP(C) No. 12884/2020, SLP(C) No. 31227/2018, SLP(C) No. 7375/2020, SLP(C) No. 2135/2021 and SLP(C) No. 6166/2021.

3. The broad outline of the impugned orders in each appeal may be stated as under:

4. In the background of afore-stated spectrum of cases, following common questions of law arise for consideration:

5. Before adverting to the afore-stated questions of law, beneficial would be to glance through the legislative history and the objects and reasons as also the relevant provisions of the MSMED Act, 2006 and of the Arbitration Act, 1996. So far as the legislative history of MSMED Act, 2006 is concer


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top