BIBHAS RANJAN DE
Asis Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Mitra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BIBHAS RANJAN DE, J.
1. At the very outset it is pertinent to mention here that the appellants not being parties to the suit or first appeal filed this appeal along with an application (CAN No. 4 of 2024) seeking leave to file appeal. Hon’ble Division Bench, considering the caveatable interest in the subject property, granted leave to file. Hence this appeal.
2. Challenge in the present appeal is to a judgment passed by Ld. Additional District Judge, 6th Court, Alipore on 02.12.2023, in connection with Title Appeal no. 84 of 2018 wherein Ld. First Appellate Court reversed the judgment and decree passed by the Ld. Civil Judge, Junior Division, 2nd Court, Alipore in Title Suit No. 302-17 of 2006.
3. The brief facts leading to the present appeal is that the subject Land was purchased on 30.05.1947 by the joint family in the name of one Kamal Basini Majumder, grandmother of plaintiffs. Said Kamal Basini Majumder executed a deed of gift on 30.08.1967 by allotting 50% of the land to her elder son Binoy Krishna Majumder and rest 50% to her grandsons namely Surojit Majumder & Subhojit Majumder. Subhojit Majumder, plaintiff no. 2/respondent no. 4 died as bachelor during pendency of t
Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali
Dulal Chandra Chatterjee and Ors. vs. Moni Mohan Mukherjee and Ors. 2004 (4) CHN 563
A deed of gift is irrevocable unless legally revoked, and a family arrangement cannot supersede it without proper grounds.
Existence of an unregistered family arrangement deed does not confer partition rights absent proper registration and stamp duty where required by law.
The properties in question were determined to be ancestral, granting coparcenary rights to the daughter under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.
A Karta under Mitakshara law cannot alienate joint family property via a Will; it is a family arrangement. Possession under a void document can lead to adverse possession if maintained for the requis....
In a partition suit, registered documents act as constructive notice, initiating the limitation period. Prolonged exclusive possession of ancestral property by a co-owner establishes ouster. Addition....
Properties claimed as self-acquired were determined to be ancestral; the appeal for partition was dismissed due to lack of joint possession evidence and non-joinder of necessary parties, also barred ....
The burden of proof lies on the party claiming undue influence to establish that the other party had the ability to dominate their will, which was not proven in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.