SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Sunquest Information Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to order (Para 1) |
| 2. details of five employees (Para 2) |
| 3. inspection reports and findings (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
1. The present writ application has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondents to recall the order of enquiry dated 30th November, 2021 passed under paragraph 26B of the EPF Scheme of 1952 by the respondent no. 2.
2. The petitioner’s case as made out in the writ application is that:
(ii) The monthly salaries of t
Kichha Sugar Company Limited through General Manager vs. Tarai Chini Mill Majdoor Union, Uttarakhand
Manipal Academy of Higher Education vs. Provident Fund Commissioner
Muir Mills Co. Ltd., Kanpur vs. Its Workmen
The court upheld the authority's order confirming the eligibility of employees for Provident Fund membership despite their salaries exceeding the statutory limit, emphasizing the welfare nature of th....
The Supreme Court defined 'basic wage' under the EPF Act, clarifying that only universally paid wages qualify, while variable allowances do not.
The terrain allowance is not included in 'basic wages' as defined by the EPF Act due to its inconsistency among employees; thus, it is exempt from EPF contributions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.