SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, UDAY KUMAR
Subhendu Naskar – Appellant
Versus
Ramita Naskar (Ranjan) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties entered into marriage (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. relationship soured and complaints (Para 3) |
| 3. wife withdrew complaint (Para 4) |
| 4. parties resided at rented house (Para 5) |
| 5. suit for restitution of conjugal rights (Para 6) |
| 6. wife filed narazi petition (Para 7) |
| 7. birth of daughter (Para 8) |
| 8. divorce suit filed (Para 9) |
| 9. irretrievable breakdown of marriage (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. wild and unsubstantiated allegations (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 11. no clear corroborative evidence (Para 34 , 35) |
| 12. repeated nature of complaints (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 13. contradictory statements (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 14. allegations without corroborative evidence (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 83 , 84 , 85) |
| 15. marriage has irretrievably broken down (Para 80) |
| 16. grant a decree of divorce (Para 81 , 82) |
JUDGMENT :
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed against a judgment and decree whereby the appellant/husband’s suit for divorce on
Rani Narsimha Sastry v. Rani Suneela Rani
R. Srinivas Kumar v. R. Shametha
Uma Talapatra v. Manabendra Talapatra
Avinash Eknath Nikalje v. Leela Avinash Nikalje
Debabrata Chakraborty v. Rina Chakraborty
Continuous baseless allegations and criminal complaints by one spouse can constitute mental cruelty, justifying divorce when the marriage has irretrievably broken down.
(1) Divorce – A dead marriage must be given a decent quietus.(2) Friendship between two persons of different genders ipso facto cannot, in today’s society, be construed to be illicit relationship.
False allegations and harassment by a spouse can result in mental cruelty, justifying divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that allegations of mental cruelty and adultery must be proven, and divorce cannot be granted on the ground of irretrievable break-down of marriage....
Cruelty in matrimonial law encompasses both physical and mental aspects, with the impact on the aggrieved spouse being crucial for determining divorce.
Persistent false allegations of cruelty and emotional distress warrant granting divorce under the Special Marriage Act, establishing grounds for dissolution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.