IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, UDAY KUMAR
Md. Abbas – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:-
1. The present appeal and death reference arise out of the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act), for both of which death sentence was awarded, under Section 363 of the IPC, for which rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs. 5000/-, in default further rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months was awarded, and under Section 366 of the IPC, for which ten years of rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5000/-, in default, rigorous imprisonment for a further period of six months, was handed out. The sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. The facts of the case are that the victim girl, who was about sixteen years of age and a school student at the time of her death, had gone to school on August 21, 2023. On her way back home, the appellant kidnapped the diseased, who was immature and a late learner, on his bicycle, took her to a lonely place at Motajote, on the land of one Samul Bagh's family, where he raped and murdered her brutally. According to the prosecution case, the appellant also tried to muti
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and others
A.N. Venkatesh and another v. State of Karnataka
Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Khushwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Manoharan v. State by Inspector of Police, Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore
The court held that the death penalty is inappropriate for a first-time offender without prior convictions; life imprisonment is more suitable given mitigating circumstances.
The death penalty can be commuted to life imprisonment if mitigating factors outweigh aggravating circumstances, particularly demonstrating lack of premeditation or extreme brutality in the crime.
The judgment establishes that circumstantial evidence must form a complete, unbroken chain directly linking the accused to the crime, which warranted a life sentence in this case.
Court emphasized the application of circumstantial evidence principles where all links confirmed the appellant's guilt in the kidnapping, sexual assault, and murder of a minor, upholding a death sent....
(1) Constitutional guarantees of equality before law, protection of life and personal liberty, protection in respect of conviction, and protection against arrest and detention, do not expand into a c....
The court ruled that the death penalty is not warranted in this case, emphasizing the need for a balance between aggravating and mitigating circumstances, ultimately commuting the sentence to 30 year....
(1) Evidence is only to be weighed and not to be counted – It is essentially, for prosecution to decide as to how many witnesses are to be examined to establish its case on any particular point.(2) D....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.