IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, UDAY KUMAR
Celica Developers (P) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Wadhwana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common judgement from appeals regarding tenant status. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. debate on the inclusivity of amenity charges as rent. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. previous pleadings impact current legal interpretations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. legal action authorized by a company's director is requisite. (Para 20 , 21 , 24) |
| 5. final verdict emphasizes tenant's responsibility under rental law. (Para 80 , 82) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The present first appeals and cross-objection arise out of a common judgement and separate decrees dated January 6, 2017, passed by the learned Judge, Seventh Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Title Suit No. 554 of 2008 and Title Suit No. 1973 of 2008, respectively filed by the appellant Celica Developers (P) Limited and the respondent M/s Wadhwana.
3. FAT No.66 of 2017 has been filed by the plaintiff/appellant against the dismissal of its eviction suit, whereas FA no.156 of 2022 has been preferred by it against the decree passed in the respondent's suit. A cross-objection, bearing COT No.33 of 2018, has been filed by the respondent in respect of the appeals.
5. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant argues that whatever amounts are
The definition of 'rent' under tenancy law includes essential service charges, thereby altering tenancy governance based on total payable amount.
The main legal point established is that the interpretation of the word 'rent' in the Act of 1997 is inclusive of non-variable components paid for use and enjoyment of facilities, and the acceptance ....
Rejection of plaint – Civil suit cannot be maintained by overriding statutory embargo.
Municipal tax is distinct from rent in tenancy agreements unless explicitly included; failure to pay municipal tax does not constitute default in rent payments if rent obligations are met.
A tenant's change of user from commercial to residential use constitutes a breach of tenancy terms under Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act, independent of any proof of damage to the prem....
A transferee/landlord can issue an ejectment notice even before the expiry of the statutory period of one year from the date of purchase, and can file a suit for ejectment immediately after the expir....
A suit for eviction under general law serves as adequate notice under the Transfer of Property Act, thus fulfilling statutory requirements for eviction and addressing issues of maintainability despit....
Tenants must not make permanent alterations without consent; violations justify eviction under tenancy laws.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.