Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS
Acarya Vishvadevananda Avadhuta – Appellant
Versus
Ananda Marga Pracharaka Samgha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS, J.
1. This revisional application is directed against an order dated 21st February, 2014, passed by the Learned Additional District and Session Judge, Purulia, in Misc. appeal no. 32 of 2012 arising out of an order dated 19th December, 2012 passed by the Learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Additional Court Purulia in title suit no 305 of 2003 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 is rejected.
2. The opposite Party Nos 2 to 4 filed a Title suit 305 of 2003 praying inter alia a decree for declaration that the 15 members including the Opposite Parties no. 2 to 4 listed in Annexure II to the plaint are the elected office bearers and members of Governing Body of Ananda Marge Pracaraka Samgha in the year 2003-2004, a decree of declaration that the original defendant no 1 and 3 have no right and competence to withhold the charge of the office of Ananda Marge Pracaraka Samgha and the said original defendant no. 1 and 2 are not the office bearers of the Governing body and thus have no right and interest to act as the President and General Secretary of the Governing Body.
3. An application under
The court emphasized that exclusive rights to manage a religious organization and hold events must await formal judicial determination, and principles of res judicata prevent repetitive litigation on....
Compliance with Order-1 Rule-8 CPC was not necessary as the societies were capable of suing or being sued without taking recourse to the rule. The judgment in the earlier suit was binding on each and....
The court upheld the appointment of a Receiver to protect religious property, affirming the right to worship and correcting procedural omissions under inherent powers.
Judicial orders must maintain consistency; once signed by a judge, an order cannot be rescinded without legitimate reasons, ensuring lawful procedural conduct in civil matters.
The court upheld the recognized rights of a religious community to perform rituals in a temple and deemed the ongoing civil proceedings as sufficient to adjudicate any disputes regarding those rights....
The main legal point established in the given judgment is the conflict between the orders of the District Munsif and the I Additional District Judge in OS No.509 of 2019, and the requirement of permi....
Point of law: Section 63, it is the Joint Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner who has to decide any dispute as to whether an institution is a religious institution or not. Even before deciding whethe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
