IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Rajan Kumar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
New Town Development Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajasekhar Mantha, J.
1. The present appeals are directed against a judgment and order dated 18th October 2023, passed by a Single Judge of this Court in writ petition being WPA 15903 of 2018. By the said judgment, the Single Bench dismissed the writ petition, refusing to pass any order of demolition in respect of the 16th tower, which was constructed as per the revised sanction plan granted by the New Town Kolkata Development Authority (NKDA) of the year 2015 (The original sanction plan was of the year 2007).
A. FACTS OF THE CASE
2. The facts relevant to the case are that sometime in the year 2007, one M/s. Keppel Magus Pvt. Ltd. (original developer) published brochures for the construction of a residential complex comprising about 15 towers, each having about 23 stories and containing 1278 flats. The complex known as “Elita Garden Vista” (EGV) was to contain several facilities like gardens, wide open areas, a swimming pool, water bodies, clubhouses, shopping areas and other comfort living facilities. There were 1688 car parking spaces. The plinth area of construction was 37,369.74 sq. mtrs. The total area of land allotted by the WBHIDCO for the project was 99,983 sq. mete
Supertech Limited v. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association and Ors.
Forum for People’s Collective Efforts v State of West Bengal
Calcutta Metropolitan Development Authority v. Smt. Ratna Banerjee and Others
West Bengal Properties Limited v. State of West Bengal
Acquet Trading Co. Private Limited &. Another v. State of West Bengal
Jayantilal Investments v. Madhuvihar Coop. Housing Society
State of Jharkhand v. Brahmputra Metallics Ltd.
All India Power Engineer Federation v. Sasan Power Ltd.
Murlidhar Aggarwal v. State of U.P.
Urban Improvement Trust v. Smt. Vidhya Devi And Ors.
State of U.P. v. Raja Ram Jaiswal
Management of Narendra & Co Pvt Ltd v. Workmen
Prabir Kumar Talukdar v WBHIDCO and Ors.
Consent of existing flat owners is mandatory for modifications to original building plans under relevant statutes, and failure to secure such consent renders subsequent constructions illegal.
(1) Breach by planning authority of its obligation to ensure compliance with building regulations is actionable at instance of residents whose rights are infringed by violation of law. Their quality ....
Modifications to sanctioned real estate plans affecting common amenities require two-thirds consent from allottees, as mandated by the RERA Act.
The original HIDCO plan was the only legally valid sanctioned plan, and the impugned order lacked credible defense and was contrary to legal provisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Corporation Officers must comply with the principles enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India, treat everyone equally, and not....
Fraud in obtaining building permits triggers action under Section 7-A alongside ongoing proceedings under Section 10 of the Regulation of Building Operations Act, establishing non-mutual exclusivity ....
The court upheld the Developer's right to amend construction plans under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, emphasizing the need to consider balance of convenience and irreparable injury in grantin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.