IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, JJ.
Maynul Bere @ Sk. Maynul & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
C.R.A. 283 of 2015 With C.R.A. 266 of 2015 With C.R.A. 320 of 2015
Decided On : 18-08-2025
JUDGMENT :
Rajasekhar Mantha, J.
1. The present appeals are directed against the judgment and order of conviction dated 22nd April 2015 and 23rd April 2015 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC-1), Krishnanagar, Nadia, in Sessions Trial No. 2 July (2008) arising out of Sessions Case No. 132(5) of 2007. The appellants, Maynul Bere, Latif Shaikh, Maisuddin Shaikh, Waser Sk @ Wacher Mayra, were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
2. The appellants Mosaref Sk @ Musa, Maisuddin Sk, Faisuddin Bere, Jahangir Sk, Mainul Bere, WasirSk @ Wacher Mayra, Latif Sk, Ismail Mallick, AtabSk, Tayeb Ali Sk and Nur Islam @ Icchu were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years with fine, for offence punishable under Section 326 read with Section 34 of the IPC.
THE PROSECUTION CASE
3. The prosecution case is that on the 9th November, 2005 at about 09:00 AM in a plot of agricultural land located at a place called “Banskata” Math (field), Haphijuddin Mallick (PW 4) (resident of Dingel Village, under Kaliaganj PS) saw that accused Tayeb Ali Sk was ploughing into the former’s land after breaking an ‘aile’ (a partition between two tracts of land made of mud in the form of a raised platform also used for walking). Upon being confronted by PW 4 and one Moijuddin, Tayeb Ali Sk. attacked PW 4 and hit him with a stick on his head. Tayeb thereafter left the place along with Faizuddin Bere, to Borobighe village (1 km away) under Nakashipara PS, and brought the accused persons, Maynul Bere, Latif Sk., Maijuddin Sk., Waser Sk, Mosaref, Faijuddin Bere, Jahangir Sk., Mainul Bere, Ismail Mallick, Atab Sk. and Nur Islam and several other persons altogether about 20-30 persons.
4. At the relevant point in time, Lalchand Mallick, Sabdullah Mallick and Burhan Ali, all sons of PW 4, were present in the field reaping paddy along with workers. The accused persons and their associates are stated to have come from Borobighe village along with a Ram Dao (a long, curved, sharp cutting instrument used in agriculture), Sticks, Tangi (another sharp cutting instrument used in agriculture) and other sharp cutting instruments and attacked Haphijuddin, his sons, Lalchand Mallick, Burhan Mullick and Sabdullah. Lalchand was stated to have been restrained by two persons, Moijuddin and Faijuddin (stated by PW 9) or Latif (stated by PW 2) or Latif and Moijuddin (stated by PW 10).
5. Maijuddin, Momin and Faijuddin, Maynul and Latif are stated to have inflicted injuries on Haphijuddin, Burhan and Sabdullah with a Ramdao and sticks. Maynul is stated to have struck Lalchand in the nape of the neck with a Ramdao, as deposed by PWs 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9.
6. Lalchand is stated to have died on the spot or on the way to the Saktinagar hospital and was declared dead or arrival at the hospital. Burhan Mallick suffered grievous injuries in the right infra-scapular region on the back with diaphragm injury of 10” x 2” in the chest cavity and abdomen, and was hospitalised for eleven days. Haphijuddin suffered an incised injury on the left scapula region, muscle deep and bone deep, 5” x ½”. The bed head ticket was exhibited. Haphijuddin Mallick suffered a fresh incised injury on the scalp, 1” x ¼” x ¼”, and another injury on the scalp of ½” x ¼” x ¼”. He was in the hospital for three days. Sabdullah Mallick suffered incised injuries on the scalp, 1” x ¼” and with severe low back pain. He was in the hospital for 2 days.
7. PW 8 Ajila Bibi, mother of the deceased; PW 9 Hawatan Bibi, sister of the deceased and PW 10 Abdul Samad Mallick, husband of PW 9, are stated to have reached the place of occurrence from their house after hearing about the incident. The house is located at a distance of 1 km from the PO. While PWs 8 and 9 claimed that they sustained injuries in the scuffle trying to save Haphijuddin, no injury reports or bed head tickets of their treatment were produced in the trial.
8. After the incide
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat
Pedda Narayana v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Md. Jabbar Ali v. State of Assam
The court reaffirmed that discrepancies in minor details do not undermine the credibility of eyewitnesses in violent crimes where the prosecution has established overwhelming evidence of guilt.
Conviction cannot stand when significant doubts arise due to contradictory testimonies and acquittal of co-accused on similar evidence, emphasizing the principle of parity in criminal proceedings.
Point of Law : Any outsider or stranger committing a crime of murder, in which event, identification of assailant becomes very critical and crucial but in light of evidences as brought on record, ide....
The principle of vicarious liability under Section 149 IPC confirms that all members of an unlawful assembly are guilty of offenses committed in prosecution of a common object, regardless of individu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for reliability and consistency in witness testimonies and evidence presented by the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doub....
The conviction was modified from Section 304(Part-II) to Section 325 of IPC, establishing that while the actions resulted in serious injury, they did not demonstrate the intent necessary for murder.
The sufficiency of evidence and the absence of medical reports presented during the trial were the main legal points established in the given judgment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.