In the High Court at Calcutta
ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.
Berger Paints India Limited - Petitioner
Versus
Gphp Holdings Pvt Ltd - Respondent
IA NO. GA-COM 3 of 2025, CS-COM 48 of 2025
Decided On : 07-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims unpaid dues and contemplates urgency. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendant contests urgency and claims prior awareness. (Para 6 , 15 , 17) |
| 3. court stresses need for evaluation of urgency in claims. (Para 20 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. court clarifies conditions under which mediation may be dispensed. (Para 21 , 23) |
| 5. application by defendant denied based on merit. (Para 30) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.
FACTS:
1. The instant application has been filed by the defendant for withdrawal and/or cancelling and/or revoking the direction of the Co-ordinate Bench granting dispensation of requirement under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (for short “CC Act”).
2. The claim of the plaintiff was for unpaid consideration on account of goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant.
3. On the basis of contemplating an urgency for an interim order, the petitioner/plaintiff applied before this Court seeking dispensation of the requirement under Section 12A of the CC Act being the pre-suit mediation procedure.
4. The principal averments made by the plaintiff, in support of such claim, are quoted from the plaint:
“10. The parties were maintaining running and continuous account. Upon adjustment of all payments made by the defendant, as per the ledger maintained by the plaintiff, in respect of the said accounts of the defendant, there is a total outstanding sum of Rs.1,01,60,721/- which commensurate with on account invoices from February 2024 to June, 2024 with regard to Account No. 57027 and Account No. 66404. The details of the outstanding invoices are mentioned in a Schedule and a copy whereof is annexed hereto and marked with the letter “C”. The ledgers maintained by the plaintiff with regard to the aforesaid two accounts are collectively annexed hereto and marked with the letter “D” series.
11. From time to time, the plaintiff requested the defendant to clear the aforesaid outstanding invoices, but the defendant failed and neglected to clear the same. However, the defendant, on such demand being made by the plaintiff, agreed for a meeting to be held at the office of the plaintiff at Berger House, 129, Park Street, Kolkata-700017, within the jurisdiction aforesaid.
12. In the meeting held on 4th February, 2025 at the registered office of the plaintiff at Berger House, 129, Park Street, Kolkata-700017, within the jurisdiction aforesaid, the representative of the defendant expressed that the defendant is in dire straits and in requirement of funds and for such funds, were trying to sell their plaint situated at Sarurpur Industrial Area, Faridabad. Further it was informed that a Scheme of Compromise with the creditors under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 would be filed before the Hon’ble National Law Tribunal for settlement of the dues of the creditors. The representative of the plaintiff has expressed that such scheme is not acceptable to the plaintiff at all. The discussions of the meeting was recorded in an e-mail dated 12th February, 2025 by the defendant and a copy whereof is annexed hereto and marked with the letter “E”. The said email has been prepared and issued by the defendant at 234/3A, Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road, Kolkata-700020, outside the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court and has been received by the plaintiff at 129, Park Street, Police Station Park Street, Kolkata-700017, within the aforesaid jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
13. In another meeting held on 20th March, 2025 at the corporate office of the plaintiff at Berger Paints Corporate Office at CF Block, New Town, Action Area- 1, New Town Kolkata-700156, outside the jurisdiction aforesaid, and by an e-mail dated 24th March, 2025, the defendant expressed its precarious financial condition and the closure of the operation of the blade plant located at Sarurpur Industrial Area, Faridabad, outside the jurisdiction aforesaid. The defendant communicated that an application for scheme in compromise and arrangement under Section 230-
Urgent interim relief under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act permits dispensation of pre-litigation mediation if properly articulated by the plaintiff.
Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act mandates exhaustion of pre-institution mediation unless a suit clearly contemplates urgent interim relief, a point upheld by the court in dismissing the petit....
Under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, pre-suit mediation is mandatory, and merely claiming urgency is insufficient without demonstrable evidence in the pleadings.
Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act requires pre-institution mediation for suits not seeking urgent relief, establishing a mandatory procedural framework.
The mandatory nature of pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act requires genuine urgency to bypass mediation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.