JUDGMENT :

1. Since same set of facts are involved in all the petitions, therefore, they are heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner has raised objection with regard to hearing of this matter by this Bench contending that the matters are presently part heard before Coordinate Bench of this Court, therefore, in the interest of propriety, it is settled law that all the part heard matters should be placed before the Bench, who has already heard the matter, so that Bench can decide whether the same should be released. He would further submit that appropriate course of action would be that the matter should be placed before the other Coordinate Bench, who has partly heard the matter, so that he can decide whether he would wish to hear the matters or release them to be placed before the roster bench.

3. This issue is decided first as it goes to the route of the matter. I have heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Senior counsel for the State and perused the order-sheets of the case recorded on 28.02.2020, 03.03.2020, 05.05.2020, 09.10.2020 & 19.10.2020, wherein nowhere mentioned in the order-