SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Vikki @ Bharat, S/o Kriparam Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Police Station Rajhara – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. Sole appellant namely, Vikki @ Bharat (A-1) in Cr.A. No.279/2012; sole appellant namely, Ajay Singh (A-2) in Cr.A. No.278/2012; and sole appellant namely, Shahid Ali (A-3) in Cr.A.No.272/2012, have preferred these appeals under Section 374(2) of the CrPC feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment dated 20-1-2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Balod, in Sessions Trial No.52/2011, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted and sentenced the appellants in the following manner: -
| Conviction | Sentence |
| Sec. 147 read with Sec. 149 of the IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for two years |
| Sec. 364 read with Sec. 149 read with Sec. 120B of the IPC | Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 50/- each, in default, additional rigorous imprisonment for three months |
| Sec. 302 read with Sec. 149 read with Sec. 120B of the IPC | Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 50/- each, in default, additional rigorous imprisonment for three months |
| Sec. 201 of the IPC | Rigorous imprisonment for two years and |
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal
Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Pattu Rajan v. State of Tamil Nadu
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. State of Maharashtra
Rama Nand and others v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Rambraksh alias Jalim v. State of Chhattisgarh
Rishi Pal v. State of Uttarakhand
Sanjay Rajak v. State of Bihar
Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Shafhi Mohd. v. State of H.P. (2018) 5 SCC 311 : (2018) 2 SCC (Cri) 704
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.