HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI, JJ.
Kishan Kumar Sidar, S/o. Late Nanki Ram Sidar – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Malkharoda – Respondent
CRA No. 676 of 2018
Decided On : 01-07-2025
Judgment :
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the CrPC is directed against the impugned judgment & order dated 25-1- 2018 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti in Sessions Trial No.32/2016, by which the appellant herein has been convicted for offence under Sections 302 (two times) & 201 (two times) of the IPC and sentenced as under with a direction that the sentences shall run concurrently: -
| Conviction | Sentence |
| Section 302 of the IPC (two times for causing murder of Nankiram & Nankibai) | Imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 500/- on two counts, in default, additional simple imprisonment for one month, on two counts. |
| Section 201 of the IPC (two times) | Rigorous imprisonment for five years Rs. with fine of 500/- on two counts, in default, additional simple imprisonment for one month, on two counts |
2. Case of the prosecution, in short, is that the appellant herein in between 1-7-2015 and 31-7-2015 at Village Chandeladih, Police Station Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa, caused the death of his father Nankiram Sidar (D-1) and his step-mother Nankibai Lohar (D-2) by making assault by axe and thereby committed their murder and in order to screen himself from the offence, buried the dead bodies under the compost pit in his house and thereby committed the offence. It is not in dispute that deceased Nankiram Sidar (D-1) was the father of the appellant and deceased Nankibai Lohar (D-2) was the step- mother of the appellant and since Nankiram Sidar (D-1) has entered into second marriage with Nankibai Lohar (D-2), who is of other caste, the appellant has left his father’s house and D-1 & D-2, both were living together and the appellant was residing with his cousin Jhadu Sidar (PW-3). Thereafter, on being called by his father Nankiram Sidar (D-1), the appellant started living with his father and all of a sudden, immediately prior to the date of offence, the appellant came to Jhaduram (PW-3) and left the premises giving him the keys of his house citing that his father & mother had gone out of the village for earning their livelihood and he is also going.
3. In the year 2016, the appellant came back to the village and he was taken into custody by Police Station Malkharoda under Crime No.127/2016 for offence punishable under Sections 457 & 380 of the IPC and in that case, Investigating Officer Shivnath Tandon (PW-15) recorded the memorandum statement of the appellant vide Ex.P-38 on 18-6-2016 in which the appellant has disclosed that he has committed the murder of his father (D-1) & mother (D-2) while they were sleeping and buried the dead bodies under the compost pit of his house. Thereafter, vide Ex.P-40, Investigating Officer of the present case K.P. Gupta (PW-17) made a request for police remand of the accused/ appellant to the remand court alleging that the accused in the present case has killed his father & mother and buried the dead bodies in the compost pit and remand was granted by the jurisdictional criminal court. Accordingly, vide Ex.P-41, Investigating Officer K.P. Gupta (PW-17) wrote a letter to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sakti for appointment of Executive Magistrate for exhumation of the dead bodies and thereafter, vide Ex.P-36, the SDM, Sakti has appointed Mr. A.R. Khan, Tahsildar, Malkharoda for exhumation of the dead bodies and vide Ex.P-27, on 19-6-2016, mouka panchnama i.e. panchanama of the place of incident was prepared and vide Ex.P-28, dead bodies were exhumed. Identification panchnama of the dead bodies of D-1 & D-2 was prepared vide Ex.P-12 by Investigating Officer K.P. Gupta (PW-17). Inquest over the dead bodies of both the deceased persons was conducted vide Exs.P-16 & P-17 and dehati merg was prepared vide Exs.P-44 & P-45. Male dead body/skeleton was identified as Nankiram Sidar (D-1) through hair, baniyan, underwear & gamcha and female dead body/skeleton was identified as Nankibai Lohar (D-2) through hair, green colour sari, bangles & mala. Thereafter, vide Ex.P- 29, m


Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
State of Rajasthan v. Bhup Singh
Kaliya v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Rama Nand and others v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Rajak v. State of Bihar
Rambraksh alias Jalim v. State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. State of Maharashtra
Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
AI
Circumstantial evidence must establish an unbroken chain of guilt while ensuring all evidentiary rules are followed; failure in this renders conviction unsustainable.
The court emphasized that DNA evidence must be corroborated by substantive evidence and procedural integrity is essential for its admissibility in criminal cases.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in circumstantial evidence cases, where the absence of direct evidence and procedural lapses in evidence handling may lead to ac....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, and the evidence prese....
The mere recovery of a body from an accused's statement is insufficient for conviction under murder charges; corroborative evidence is essential.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.