SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Chh) 471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ.
J. Venktesh @ J. Venkat @ Motu, S/o. J. Ram Babu - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.266 of 2016, Criminal Appeal No.525 of 2016
Decided On : 02-11-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Mr. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ishan Verma, Panel Lawyer.

Point of Law: Section 162 of the CrPC states as Explanation. - An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2), 161, 162 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302, 34, 307 - Murder Offence – Appeal against Conviction - Juvenile accused assaulted deceased by wooden stick by which he suffered injury on his head and succumbed to death - Testimonies do not inspire confidence and their statements are not trustworthy. [Para 41]

Finding of the Court :

Delay in recording statements of eyewitnesses under Section 161 of CrPC i.e. (PW-9), (PW-10) & (PW-11), creates a doubt on testimonies of these three alleged eyewitnesses - This Court is also of considered opinion that disclosure statements Exs.P-13 & P-14 and subsequent seizure vide Exs.P-16 & P-17 pursuant to said disclosure statements have not been proved beyond reasonable doubt - Even (PW-5), one of memorandum & seizure witnesses, has turned hostile and another memorandum & seizure witness (PW-9) has failed to prove disclosure and recovery beyond reasonable doubt - Thus, Court is of considered opinion that in absence of any other legal evidence, it would be unsafe to affirm conviction recorded by trial Court to appellants herein and accordingly, Court set aside conviction and sentences imposed upon appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC.

Result: Appeals allowed.

JUDGMENT :

[Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.]

1. Since both the above criminal appeals have arisen out of one and same judgment dated 13-11-2015 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Durg in Sessions Trial No.182/2014 and since common question of fact and law is involved in both the appeals, they have been clubbed together, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Sole appellant in Cr.A.No.266/2016 J. Venkatesh and sole appellant in Cr.A.No.525/2016 Rajkumar Pandey have preferred by these two appeals under Section 374(2) of the CrPC against the impugned judgment convicting them for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 250/- each, in default, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 15-8-2014 at night 8 p.m. at J.P. Chowk, Near Jhola Kunwa, Camp-2, Bhilai, Police Station Chhawni, in furtherance of their common intention, the appellants herein and one juvenile accused Shiva assaulted deceased Laxman Thakur by wooden stick by which he suffered injury on his head and succumbed to death and thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. Further case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 15-8- 2014, the appellants herein and the juvenile accused assaulted the deceased by wooden stick by which he suffered death and thereafter, one boy – unknown to him, resident of same locality, informed to the brother of the deceased – Mahesh Thakur (PW-2) about the incident, then Mahesh Thakur (PW-2) firstly lodged first information report against the appellants herein and the juvenile accused vide Ex.P-8 and thereafter, lodged morgue intimation vide Ex.P-7 stating that on the fateful day, three accused persons assaulted the deceased by which he suffered injury and died on the spot. Thereafter, Alexander Kiro (PW-12) – investigating officer, reached to the spot and collected bloodstained soil and plain soil vide Ex.P-15 and thereafter, panchnama was prepared vide Ex.P- 20. Dead body of the deceased was sent for postmortem which was conducted by Dr. Vipin Jain (PW-3) and his postmortem report is Ex.P-3. Cause of death was head injury. Thereafter, the appellants were arrested and pursuant to the memorandum statement of appellant J. Venkatesh vide Ex.P-13, wooden stick admeasuring 29½" width 5¼" circumference was recovered with blood stains vide Ex.P-16. Similarly, on the basis of memorandum statement of appellant Rajkumar Pandey vide Ex.P-14, one broken piece of wooden stick 27¼" x 6¼" was seized vide Ex.P-17. Articles seized were sent for forensic examination to the Forensic Science Laboratory and the FSL report is Ex.P-25 according to which blood as well as human blood was found on wooden stick Articles C & D and blood was found on shirt & pant of the deceased also, but blood group could not be ascertained. Statement of eyewitness G. Ashok Kumar (PW-9) under Section 161 of the CrPC was recorded on 16-8-2014 and statements of other two eyewitnesses – Soni Bai (PW-10) & Tulsi Beni (PW-11) under Section 161 of the CrPC were recorded on 29-8-2014.

4. Thereafter, after usual investigation, the appellants were chargesheeted for offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and their case was committed to the Court of Sessions for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.

5. The prosecution, in order to prove the offence against the appellants, examined as many as 12 witnesses and brought on record 26 documents Exs.P-1 to P-26. The defence has examined the appellants herein as DW-1 Rajkumar & DW-2 J. Venkatesh and witnesses Smt. S. Sarita (DW-3) & J. Rambabu (DW-4), and brought into record six documents Ex.D-1 to D-6.

6. The trial Court after appreciating oral and documentary evidence on record, finding the testimony of eyewitnesses G. Ashok Kumar (PW- 9), Smt. Soni Bai (PW-10) & Tulsi Beni (PW-11)

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top