SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 1296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.Y. KOGJE, HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, JJ.
Akshay Arunkumar Borade - Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat - Respondent
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2091 of 2019 With R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 126 of 2020 With R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 152 of 2020 With R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 157 of 2020
Decided on : 03-08-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR. ALKESH N SHAH, MR. PRATIK BAROT
For the Respondent: MS. SHRUTI PATHAK

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 506(2), and 114 - Gujarat Police Act - Section 135 - Conviction of appellants for murder and related offenses - Rigorous imprisonment for life and fines imposed. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Eyewitness testimony - Inconsistency among eyewitness accounts casts doubt on the reliability of the prosecution's case, especially concerning the roles of specific appellants. (Paras 5-21)

(C) Principle of benefit of the doubt - Established inconsistencies lead to the conclusion that the evidence against certain appellants does not prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 20-27)

Facts of the case:
Four appellants attacked the deceased armed with swords after a disagreement over past incidents, leading to the death of the victim and injuries to the informant. (Paras 3.1-3.3)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the convictions of two appellants while granting the benefit of doubt to the other two due to inconsistencies in witness accounts. (Paras 28-30)

Issues: The credibility of eyewitnesses and the adequacy of the evidence to support the convictions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court noted that inconsistencies among eyewitnesses and lack of corroborative evidence raise doubts as to the guilt of certain appellants, necessitating a finding of not guilty. (Paras 20, 27)

Result: Appeals allowed for two appellants; convictions for others affirmed and dismissed.

Table of Content
1. background of criminal appeal and convictions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. challenges to eyewitness testimonies and inconsistencies. (Para 5 , 6)
3. evaluation of witness credibility and evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 19)
4. insufficiency of evidence against certain accused. (Para 20 , 21 , 26)
5. concluding remarks on conviction and acquittal. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT :

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)

1. These are the four appeals under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order dated 22.08.2019 by the Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Sessions Case No.103 of 2018. By the aforesaid judgment, the appellants were convicted for offences under Sections 302 , 506(2) and 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short “IPC”) read with Section 135 of the GUJARAT POLICE ACT .

2. Pursuant to such conviction, all the four appellants have been inflicted with rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.25,000/- under Section 302 of IPC.

2.1. All the appellants have also been imposed punishment for three years of rigorous imprisonment under Sections 506(2) of IPC and for offence under Section 135 of the GP Act, fine of Rs.100/- is imposed.

3. The incident was registered as offence being C.R. No.-I-55 of 2018 with Panigate Police Station, Vadodara and was thereafter committed as Sessions Case No.103 of 2018. The record indicates compliance of necessary provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly Section 209 insofar as procedure of trial is concerned.

3.1. The incident was reported of 26.03.2018 at about 11:30 P.M.. The informant-Jaydeepbhai Vishnubhai Thakkar alongwith his friends Vicky Kishorbhai Kanojiya (deceased) accompanied by other friends went to play cricket at an open ground at Gomtipura area.

3.2. While the play was in progress, the convicts arrived at the scene of offence armed with swords and inflicted sword injury on vital part of the body and when informant tried to intervene, he was also assaulted and threatened because of which he ran way from the spot and later on came to know that Vicky who was severely injured was taken to Global hospital for treatment, but the said Vicky succumbed to the injuries.

3.3. The appellants were charged vide Exh.7 where the complainant Jaydeepbhai Vishnubhai Thakkar and his friend–Vikki Kishorbhai Kanojiya were playing cricket with other friends on 26.03.2018 at 23:30 o’clock near the corner of Gajrawadi, Gomtipura and at that time, one of the accused–Vishal @ Langdo Rajubhai Pawar saw deceased Vikki Kanojiya playing cricket over there and informed his father–accused No.1-Raju @ Balkrushna Shivajirao Pawar and accused no.3–Dhaval and also stated that deceased scuffled and quarreled over the rash driving of motorcycle at the time of previous Holi festival and the deceased had beaten accused–Dhaval Pawar in the said quarrel, bearing grudge thereof, as the appellant Vishal informed appellants Raju, Dhaval and Akshay that the deceased is playing cricket, all the convicts armed with the swords in order to kill the deceased, the convict no.2 by Aviator No.GJ-06-LH-8235 and convict Akshay Arunbhai Borade by Motorcycle No.GJ-06-EK-4316 reached where the accused was playing cricket, kept vehicles across, the accused Raju Pawar and Vishal inflicted sword on the deceased and as the deceased brought hand in order to save himself, grave injury was caused on the hand, cut the fingers. When the complainant tried to defend Vikki, convict no.1 assaulted the complainant with sword and to kill him, the deceased ran to save his life, however, the accused chased the deceased with swords and inflicting indiscriminate blows of sword, causing his death on the spot, the convict no.4 ran on his motorcycle with Raju Pawar and Dhaval and Vishal also fled away leaving his Aviator vehicle at the scene of offence and thus, all the accused abetted each other in the said offence.

4. Learned advocates Mr. Pratik Barot and learned advocate Mr. Alkesh Shah appearing for appellants in Cr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top