Back
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Vijayendra Mahilane S/o Babulal Mahilane – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.
1. These writ petitions have been filed challenging the Gazette Notifications issued by the State Government in exercise of powers conferred under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India whereby amendment has been effected under Rule 8(1) of Chhattisgarh Civil Service (General Condition of Service) Rules, 1961 (for short, 'Rules of 1961'), sub-rule (1) of Rule 22 C of Chhattisgarh Fundamental Rules and the Circulars issued by General Administration Department dated 29.07.2020, Finance Department dated 06.08.2020, and lastly by the School Education Department dated 15.09.2020.
One writ appeal has also been filed challenging the order dated 10.6.2021passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No 2090/2021, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed. In the said writ petition, some circulars, which are under challenge in the present batch of writ petitions, were challenged.
2. The petitioners in these writ petitions are Teachers in School Education Department, Constables in Police Department, Government Servants appointed by Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission and aspirants, who wish to appear in the competitive examinations in fut
Point of Law : It is akin to doctrine of benefits and burdens which at its most basic level provides that a person taking advantage under an instrument which both grants a benefit and imposes a burde....
The power of relaxation in recruitment rules cannot override substantive mandates for promotion, ensuring adherence to constitutional rights to equality and fair promotion processes.
The court ruled that recruitment rules existing at the time of advertisement govern terms of appointment, and any retrospective application of subsequent rules is unconstitutional and violates the pr....
Widening the field of eligibility, in view of an amendment in the Recruitment Rules, does not amount to changing the rules of the game in the midst of the selection process.
The amendment allowing work-charged employees to seek promotion is constitutionally valid, as it involves rational classification and does not violate equality provisions.
The amendment mandating a Bachelor's Degree for certain promotions was constitutionally valid, emphasizing the employer's prerogative to set qualification standards related to job responsibilities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
