NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Shahid Imran, S/o Amanulla Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through- Police Station – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. As common question of law and facts are involved in bunch of all the appeals, they are heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against judgment dated 06.01.2003 passed by Special Judge, Special Court [under Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989], Raipur (C.G.) in Session Trial No. 299/2000, wherein the said court convicted and sentenced the appellants as under:-
| Conviction | Sentence |
| U/s 148 of IPC | R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 2 months. |
| U/s 307/149 of IPC | R.I. for 7 years and fine of Rs. 5000/- in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 6 months. |
| U/s 324/140 of IPC | R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 2 months. |
| U/s 395/397 of IPC | R.I. for 7 years and fine of Rs. 5000/- in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 6 months. |
| (All the s | |
Ashfaq v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Ganesan Vs. State represented by Station House Officer
Jai Narain Mishra and Ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Mahesh Balmiki vs. State of M.P.
Manga alias Man Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand (2013) 7 SCC 629
See Dalip Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Shambu Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar
Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai Patel Vs. Rajivbhai Dudabhai Patel & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.