ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Rajat Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. Madhunisha Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondent No. 1/State and Ms. Pragya Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.

2. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. with the following prayers:

“(i) It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kind enough in quashing the final report under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioners, this Hon’ble Court may further be also pleased to quash the complete charge-sheet filed against the petitioners and they be set free from the criminal trial which is now proposed by the concerned Police Station. This Hon’ble Court may also be pleased to stay the trial against present petitioners as they are not related directly shows in the allegation.”

Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. The present petitioners namely Neetu Sharma is sister-in-law (Nanad), Smt.Janki Sharma is mother-in-law (Mousi Sas), Ramavtar is father-in-law (Dada Sasur) and Bhanchand Sharma is father-in-law (Mousa Sasur) of the complainant/respondent No. 2-Sonali Joshi (Sha