Back
RAMESH SINHA, N. K. CHANDRAVANSHI
South Eastern Coalfield Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sahodri Gond W/o. Late Pran Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, J.
1. Heard Mr. Vishal Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the appellants/SECL and Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, learned counsel, appearing for the respondents.
2. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants with delay of 133 days along with an application, I.A. No. 01 of 2023, for condonation of delay in filing the instant appeal. Though the respondents have filed reply to the said application for condonation of delay on 06.08.2023, opposing the same, no rejoinder has been filed by the appellants.
3. However, on due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in I.A. No. 01 of 2023, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the instant appeal is condoned.
4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is heard finally.
5. The present intra Court appeal has been filed against the order dated 09.09.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(S) No. 591 of 2021 (Smt Sahodri Gond & Anr. Vs. South Eastern Coalfields Limited & others), whereby, the writ petition filed by the respondents herein has been allowed and directions were issued to the appellants to consider the respondents’ claim for grant of dependent employment in the light of order dat
Even the contention that there is discrimination and provisions of Clause 9.3.2 and 9.3.3 is violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India, is without any basis.
The judgment emphasizes the binding nature of the National Coal Wages Agreement, the purpose of dependent employment as relief from immediate hardship, and the concessionary nature of compassionate a....
Exclusion of married daughter is unreasonable and in violation of provisions prescribed under Articles 14 and 15 of Constitution of India.
Dependency on a deceased employee is essential to claim compassionate appointment, irrespective of marital status.
Point of Law : Apex Children born out of second marriage cannot be treated as illegitimate children, therefore, the impugned rejection order dated 24.04.2018 passed by the respondents is contrary to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
