Back
GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
Bhima Baghel S/o Late Shivnath Baghel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Goutam Bhaduri, J .
1. The present appeal is against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30-12-2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Bastar at Jagdalpur, in ST No.30/2019 whereby the trial Court sentenced the accused to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/- for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘the IPC’). The trial Court also imposed default sentence in case of failure to pay the fine.
2. Filtering the unnecessary details, the prosecution case is that on 17-3-2019 the complainant Kanu Ram (PW-1) was at his residence and at that time Mahadev Baghel (since deceased) came by beating the drum ¼ढksy½ ; the appellant followed him; and also asked for a drum, however, the deceased refused to give the same, therefore, on this issue, the dispute aggravated and they entered into scuffle. In the process, the head of the deceased was smashed on stone wall on 3-4 times, as a result of which, the deceased fell down on the floor and thereafter, the other villagers were informed; police came; and merg intimation (Ex.P/1) was registered subsequently. When it was found that the deceased has died, the offence under Section 302 of the I
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder under the Indian Penal Code, and the application of the appropriate se....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles outlined in the Supreme Court judgments to evaluate the nature of the assault, the intent of the accused, and the....
The intent behind the injuries inflicted is critical in determining the charge under IPC, with circumstantial evidence shifting some burden to the accused regarding explanations.
Eyewitness testimony cannot be dismissed solely based on familial relationships if credible; causation of death must be directly linked to injury inflicted.
The court distinguished between murder and culpable homicide, concluding that the appellant's actions fell under Section 304 Part-I due to lack of intent and premeditation.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the provisions of Section 302 and Section 300 of the IPC, and the interpretation of Exception 4 under Section 300. The court'....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the standard of proof 'beyond reasonable doubt' required for conviction in criminal cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
