SANJAY K. AGRAWAL
Bahura, W/o Late Mahadev Das – Appellant
Versus
Darasram, S/o Shivlal – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 384(3) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter shall be referred to as, 'the Act of 1925'), Bahura and others, who are applicants in both the instant civil revisions, have preferred these civil revisions calling in question the common judgment dated 5.4.2018 passed by the District Judge, Janjgir-Champa by which the learned District Judge has allowed the appeal filed by Darasram granting Succession Certificate in his favour and further dismissed the appeal preferred by the applicants herein.
2. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both the civil revisions, they have been clubbed together, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
3. Two persons namely Narayan and Phool Bai were husband and wife and were issueless. They were murdered and the police had seized total Rs.7,20,102/- as well as some silver & gold ornaments amounting to Rs.2,00,000/- approximately from their house. In the murder case of Narayan and Phool Bai, one Suresh & three other accused persons were prosecuted for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 460/34 of IPC in Sessions Trial No.93/2010
H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma
Joginder Pal v. Indian Red Cross Society & Ors.
Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Namdeo Kadam
Meena Pradhan & Ors. v. Kamla Pradhan & Anr.
Madhvi Amma Bhawani Amma & Ors. v. Kunjikutty Pillai Meenakshi Pillai & Ors.
Smt. Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar (D) Th. LR v. Arthur Import and Export Company
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.