RAMESH SINHA, RAJANI DUBEY
Shiv Kumar Singh, S/o Shri Bimal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
1. Heard Ms. Surya Kawalkar Dangi, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for respondents No. 1 & 2/State on I.A. No. 2 of 2024, which is an application for condonation of delay.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the reasons mentioned in the application, we are of the considered opinion that sufficient cause has been shown in the application and accordingly, I.A. No.2 of 2024 is allowed and delay of 119 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
3. The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the appellant/writ petitioner against the order dated 09.10.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 2209 of 2016 (Shiv Kumar Singh & Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Another), whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant/writ petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant/writ petitioner submits that respondent No. 2 took a decision to issue an advertisement in the newspapers for inviting application for filling the sanctioned and regular post of Data Entry Operators, Assistant Grade - 3, A
Amar Nath Om Prakash v. State of Punjab (1985) 1 SCC 345)
A.K. Bhatnagar & Others vs. Union of India & Others
Chintels India Ltd. vs. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Herrington v. British Railways Board [1972 AC 877 (HL)]
London Graving Dock Co. Ltd. v. Horton [1951 AC 737
Sachin Kumar & Other vs. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) & Others
Sreenivasa General Traders v. State of A.P.[(1983) 4 SCC 353]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.