NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Durgesh Yadav S/o. Late Shriram Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Public Works Department – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in all writ petitions, they are heard together and are being decided by this common order.
WPS No. 3320 of 2016.
The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for following relief:-
(ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to issue appointment letter in favour of the petitioner.
(iii) Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems, fit in the facts and circumstances may also be granted in favour of the petitioner
WPS No. 2204 of 2016.
The petitioner has prayed for following relief:-
(ii) That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to declare the results of
A.K. Bhatnagar and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Amar Nath Om Prakash v. State of Punjab (1985) 1 SCC 345
Chintels India Ltd.vs Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd.
East Coast Railway and another versus Mahadev Appa Rao and others
Herrington v. British Railways Board
London Graving Dock Co. Ltd. v. Horton, 1951 AC 737
Manoj Manu and another versus Union of India
Sakshi vs. Union of India (2004) 5 SCC 518
Sandeep Singh v. State of Haryana ((2002) 10 SCC 549
Sreenivasa General Traders v. State of A.P.
State of Haryana v. Subash Chander Marwah & Ors. AIR 1973 SC 2216
Virender S. Hooda v. State of Haryana I (1999) 3 SCC 696 : 1999 SCC (L&S) 824 : AIR 1999 SC 17011
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.