SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Chh) 284

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, CJ., RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, J.
Raj Mishra, S/o. Suresh Mishra and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through Station House Officer - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.1860 of 2023 & Criminal Appeal No.2078 of 2023
Decided On : 03-04-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Shri Ashok Kumar Verma, Shri T. K. Jha, Shri B.P. Singh, Shri Gajendra Kumar Sahu and Shri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, Advs.
For the Objector : Shri Jaydeep Singh Yadav, Adv.
For the State : Shri R.S. Marhas, Addi. A.G.

The acquittal of the accused was based on the prosecution's failure to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt amidst significant inconsistencies in eyewitness testimonies.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 120-B, and 148 - Conviction of the appellants for murder under Section 302/149 IPC and rioting under Section 148 IPC - Life imprisonment and fines imposed, sentences to run concurrently. (Paras 2, 3)

(B) Eyewitness Testimony - Credibility and consistency of eyewitnesses critical; substantial contradictions noted in testimonies. Motive insufficiently established; lack of reliable evidence for conviction beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 49-59)

Facts of the case:
The deceased was called by one appellant for celebrations, leading to an ambush where he was assaulted and ultimately died from multiple injuries, followed by a vehicle running over him. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
Trial court’s conviction based on inconsistent eyewitness testimony and insufficient evidence for establishing motive; lack of corroborative evidence wrought with contradictions. (Paras 58, 59)

Issues: Whether the death was homicidal and if the accused formed an unlawful assembly or acted independently in committing the assault. (Paras 18, 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment affirmed that merely suspecting the accused or relying on unreliable eyewitnesses is insufficient for a conviction; it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 59)

Result: Appeals allowed; appellants acquitted of all charges. Impugned judgment set aside.

Table of Content
1. overview of appeals arising from the same case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the assault on the deceased. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. procedural developments and witness examinations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. defense arguments challenging prosecution's case. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. examination of prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 22 , 24 , 58)
6. inconsistencies in eyewitness testimonies. (Para 40 , 41 , 43)
7. judicial assessment of evidence and its sufficiency. (Para 46)
8. implicating factors for establishing guilt based on evidence. (Para 56 , 57 , 59)
9. final conclusion and acquittal of the accused. (Para 60 , 61)

JUDGMENT :

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) :

1. Since both the appeals arise out of same crime and same sessions case, they are being heard and decided together by this common judgment.

2. Challenge in these appeals are the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.09.2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Durg in Sessions Case No. 130/2020 whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under :

Accused

Offence

Sentence

Raj Mishra, Rishab Paswan, Somnath @ Akshay

IN CRA No. 1860 of 2023

302/149 IPC

Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- each, in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 6 months to each accused.

U/s 148 IPC

RI for three years with fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 6 months to each accused.

Ramkuber Gupta, Sunil Gupta, Munir Gupta, Ramesh Jangade, Gopirao

IN CRA No.2078 of 2023

302/149 IPC

Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- each, in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 6 months to each accused.

U/s 148 IPC

RI for three years with fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 6 months to each accused.

All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the deceased Shailesh Yadav was having shoe business and for the purposes of his business he borrowed a sum of Rs. 50,000/- from the accused Raj Mishra. Since he failed to repay the borrowed amount, the accused Raj Mishra was not happy with him and shown his angerness. On 10.03.2020 at about 10:15 am, the accused Raj Mishra called Shailesh Yadav through mobile phone near Andhra School, Camp-1, Bhilai to celebrate Holi festival. Shailesh went to the house of Raj Mishra along with his friend Manish Yadav. The accused Raj Mishra took them by his Car towards Andhra School. When they reached near Andhra School, the accused Raj Mishra came out from his Car and called his friends Rishabh Paswan, Munir Gupta, Ramesh Jangde, Gopirao, Somnath, Sunil Gupta and Ramkuber Gupta, who were in ambush near that placed armed with Lathi. When Shailesh deboarded from his Car, the accused Raj Mishra took an iron rod from his Car and all the accused persons started assaulting Shailesh. They also chased Manish Yadav, however, he fled away from the place of occurrence. When the witness Harishchand Yadav tried to intervene, the accused persons have threatened him also. Shailesh Yadav received various injuries on his head and other parts of his body. He fell down and went unconscious. The accused Raj Mishra runs his Car over the body of Shailesh and all the accused persons fled away. The deceased was firstly taken to Sparsh Hospital, Supela from where he was shifted to Sector-9 Hospital Bhilai, but he declared died.

4. Intimation about death of deceased Shailesh Yadav was given by the doctor to Station House Officer, Police Station Sector-6, Bhilai vide Ex. P/44 where the merg intimation Ex. P/43 was recorded by the police of police Station Bhilai Nagar. Unnumbered merg intimation was sent to the jurisdictional police station Vaishali Nagar, District Durg, where numbered merg intimation Ex.P/45 was recorded. The inquest of the body was prepared on 12.03.2020 in presence of the witnesses vide Ex.P/4 and dead body was sent for its

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon Back to top