Roopesh Kumar S/o Gopal Prasad vs State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Home (Police)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Chh) 431

NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Roopesh Kumar S/o Gopal Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Home (Police) – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kishore Bhaduri, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Khulesh Sahu and Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Shristi Upadhyay, Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Mr. Tarendra Kumar Jha along with Mr. Tapan K. Chandra and Mr. Deepak Kushwaha, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Supriya Upasane, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Mr. Janu Khare, Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Manikpuri along with Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Mr. Anadi Sharma, appers through video conferencing, Ms. Durga Mehar on behalf of Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Mr. Nishi Kant Sinha, Ms. Swati Verma, Mr. Curtis Colloins, Ms. Laxmeen Kashyap, Mr. Vivek Verma, Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma along with Ms. Mamta Mahilange, Mr. R.K. Verma, Mr. Sanjay Patel, Kaushal Yadav, Ms. Sareena Khan, Mr. Paras Mani Shrivastava, Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Mr. P. Acharya, Mr. Govind Prasad Dewangan, Mr. Ashutosh Dwivedi, Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Mr. Sushil Sahu, Mr. Vinod Kumar Pandey, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Ramakant Mishra, D.S.G. along with Ms. Anmol Sharma, Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Ms. Jyoti Singh, Mr. Neraj Baghel, Mr. Rishabh Singh Deo, Central Government Counsel, Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, Mr. Avinash Singh and Mr. Avinash Tiwari, Advocates Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Abhishek Chandra Gupta, Ms. Ayushi Agrawal, Mr. Shobit Koshta, Mr. Amiya Bhushan, Ms. Swati Verma, Mr. Ravi Bhagat along with Mr. Manas Vajpai, Mr. Byas Narayan Sahu, Mr. Sunil Otwani, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

1. Since an identical issue, common facts of law are involved and common grounds of challenge have been raised in the bunch of these writ petitions they are heard analogously and are being decided by this common order.

2. The petitioners in the bunch of petitions have challenged the recruitment procedure initiated by the State for appointment in various posts in the Police Department. WP(S) No. 4378/2023 in case of Roopesh Kumar and others vs. State of CG has been taken up as lead case. The grounds of the challenges made by the petitioners and relief sought by them, in brief are as under:-

3. WP(S) No. 4378/2023, WP(S) No. 3343/2023, WP(S) No. 3384/2023, WP(S) No. 3395/2023, WP(S) No. 3750/2023, WP(S) No. 4142/2023, WP(S) No. 4149/2023, WP(S) No. 4229/2023, WP(S) No. 4232/2023, WP(S) No. 4296/2023, WP(S) No. 4302/2023, WP(S) No. 4305/2023, WP(S) No. 4307/2023, WP(S) No. 4309/2023, WP(S) No. 4310/2023, WP(S) No. 4312/2023, WP(S) No. 4318/2023, WP(S) No. 4333/2023, WP(S) No. 4400/2023, WP(S) No. 4404/2023, WP(S) No. 4414/2023, WP(S) No. 4418/2023, WP(S) No. 4433/2023, WP(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Chh) 431

NARENDRA KUMAR VYASRoopesh Kumar S/o Gopal Prasad – AppellantVersusState Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Home (Police) – Respondent

Cases Referred (15)

NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Roopesh Kumar S/o Gopal Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Home (Police) – Respondent