SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1010

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI., Sanjiv Khanna, J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.
Aligarh Muslim University – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Agarwal & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2286 of 2006
WITH
Aligarh Muslim University – Appellant
Versus
Anuj Gupta & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2321 of 2006
WITH
Aligarh Muslim University – Appellant
Versus
Vivek Kasana & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2320 of 2006
WITH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Malay Shukla & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2318 of 2006
WITH
Syed Abrar Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Aligarh Muslim University & Others – Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 32490 of 2015
WITH
Ashraf Mateen & Others – Appellants
Versus
Aligarh Muslim University & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 272 of 2016
WITH
Aligarh Muslim University Old Boys’ Alumni Association – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Aggarwal & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2861 of 2006
WITH
Haji Muqeet Ali Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
Malay Shukla & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2316 of 2006
WITH
Aligarh Muslim University – Appellant
Versus
Malay Shukla & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2319 of 2006
WITH
Aligarh Muslim University – Appellant
Versus
Manvendra Singh & Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2317 of 2006
WITH
Anoop Prabhakar & Others – Appellants
Versus
Union of India & Others – Respondents
Transfer Case (C) No. 46 of 2023
Decided On : 08-11-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Bahar. U. Barqui, Adv. Mr. Nizam Pasha, Adv. Ms. Aparjita Jamwal, Adv. Mr. Ali Safeer Farooqi, Adv. 1 Ms. Rupali Samuels, Adv. Ms. Sumedha Ray Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. Z. K. Faizan, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Taiyub Khan, Adv. Mr. Shahid Hussain Rizvi, Adv. Mr. Mansoor Alir, Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Sr. Adv. Mr. N Sai Vinod, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Vasudev, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Gulati, Adv. Mrs. Gayatri Gulati, Adv. Mr. Naveen Hegde, Adv. Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Mr. Debadutta Kanungo, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Govind Jee, AOR Mr. Omanakuttan K K, Adv. Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. Ms. Rambha Singh, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra, AOR Mr. Shadan Farasat, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sanchita Ain, AOR Mr. Gautam Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Harshit Anand, Adv. Mr. Aman Naqvi, Adv. Mr. Shadab Azhar, Adv. By Courts Motion
For the Respondent(s): Mr. R. Venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. K.M. Natraraj, A.S.G. Mr. Kartikay Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Gaurang Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Adv. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Ms. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. 2 Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Khare, Adv. Mr. Apporv Kurup, Adv. Mr. Diwakar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Ms. Aastha Singh, Adv. Mr. Aman Mehta, Adv. Mr. Rohit Khare, Adv. Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. Mr. Guru Krishnakumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. VVV Pattabhiram, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. Tadimalla Bhaskar Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Subodh Patil, Adv. Ms. Srishti Mishra, Adv. Mr. Alabhya Dhamija, Adv. Mr. Pashupati Razdan, Adv. Mr. Vikas Chandra Shukla, Adv. Ms. Aditi Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Eklavya Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Sanskriti Pathak, Adv. Mr. Merusagar Samanatray, Adv. Mr. Aditiya Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Aman Jha, Adv. Mr. Atulesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Shubhendu Anand, Adv. Mr. Pranaya Kumar Mahapatra, Adv. Mr. Baijnath Patel, Adv. Ms. Sneh Lata Mishra, Adv. Ms. Himadri Haksar, Adv. Mr. Narayan Dev Prashar, Adv. Ms. Sucheta Joshi, Adv. Mr. Prakash Gautam, Adv. Mr. Raghav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Sanyat Lodha, Adv. Mr. Rishi Tutu, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Toshiv Goyal, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Harnirmal Singh, Adv. Mr. Baij Nath Patel, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kohli, AOR Mr. Avnish Dave, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Sr. Adv. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Sr. AdvAdv. Shuchi Singh, AOR Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. T. Bhaskar Gowtham, Adv. Ms. Sindoora V.N.L, Adv. Ms. Shriya Gilhotra, Adv. Mr. Gautam Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Kumar Prashant, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Singhania, Adv. Mr. Aditya Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Varun Chugh, Adv. Mr. Rajan Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ayush Anand, Adv. Mr. Baij Nath Patel, Adv. Ms. Alpana Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pravartak Pathak, Adv. Mr. Ranjeet Mishra, Adv. Ms. Bharti Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kumar Vishnoi, Adv. Mr. Akshat Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Shaswat Nath, Adv. Mr. Shespal Sai, Adv. Mr. Gopal Jha, Adv. Mr. Sayooj Mohandas, Adv. Mr. Govind Kumar, Adv. Mr. Alabhya Dhamija, Adv. Mr. Nisarg Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Ankita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gobind Kumar, Adv. Mr. Hrishikesh Haridas, Adv. Mr. Aishvary Vikram, Adv. Mr. Sanyat Lodha, Adv. Mr. Pulkit Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv. Mr. Raghav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Prakash Gautam, Adv. Mr. Anjuman Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Ranjana Singh, Adv. Mr. Devendra Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Jainendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Aman Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Anshuman Siddharth Nayak, Adv. Mr. Salman Khurshid, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Naghma Imtiaz, Adv. Mr. Shaikh Imran, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Mansoor Ali, Adv. Mrs. Rubina Javed, Adv. Mrs. Seema Khan, Adv. Mr. Tanveer Khan, Adv. Mr. Syed Imtiaz Ali, Adv. Mrs. Azra Rehman, Adv. Mrs. Sommya Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Ahmed Zargham, Adv. Mr. Saif Naseem, Adv. Mr. Md. Sarfaraz, Adv. M/S. Equity Lex Associates, AOR Mr. Prem Prakash, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, AOR Mr. Saif Zia, Adv. Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR Ms. Gayatri Gulati, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey, AOR Mr. Krishna Kant Dubey, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Tewari, Adv. Mr. Devendra Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Pratyush Prakash, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Isha Singh, Adv. Ms. Snehil Sonam, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arun Kanwa, Adv. Mr. Vignesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Awasthi, Adv. Mr. V. Sai Shashank, Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhaskar, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Rahul G. Tanwani, Adv. Mr. Aman Jha, Adv. Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Sindhoora Vnl, Adv. Mr. Mohit Pandey, Adv. Ms. Ankita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Yashraj Bundela, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Adv. Ms. Bhavya Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Aviral Saxena, Adv. Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Y. Lokesh, Adv. Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Adv. Mr. Maitri Goal, Adv. Mr. G. Karthikeyan, Adv. Mr. Anubhav Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Sachin Kumar Verma, Adv. Mr. Arun Singh, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Mr. Mohd Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jamil Husain, Adv. Mr. Mohd Noorullah, Adv. Mr. Atif Suhrawardy, Adv. Mr. Tabrez Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Attarup Bannerjee, Adv. Mr. Sunando Raha, Adv. Mr. Pulkit Agarwal, AOR Mr. Abu Sohel, Adv. Mr. Ankur Parihar, Adv. Ms. Sampriti Baksi, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu Kaushesh, Adv. Mr. Vibhu Tandon, Adv. Mr. Avnish Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Shreyans Raniwala, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Palav Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Ananya Chaurasia, Adv. Mr. Shashwat Singh, Adv. Mr. Md Tasnimul Hassan, Adv. Mr. Zahid Ali, Adv. Mr. Anagh Misra, Adv. Mr. Suvidh Kulkarni, Adv. Mr. Md Anas Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Anubhav Lamba, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sharma, AOR Dr. Vijay Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Yatindra Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, AOR Mr. Prakash Gautam, Adv. Mr. Tanvir Zaki, Adv. Ms. Parul Dhurvey, Adv Mr. Nilesh Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI.

Table of Contents

A.

Background

B.

The reference and related events

C.

Submissions

D.

Issues

E.

Analysis

i. The preliminary objection by the Union of India

ii. The scope of Article 30

a. The purpose of Article 30(1)

b. The ‘special protection’ guaranteed by Article 30(1)

iii. Indicia for a Minority Educational Institution

iv. Applicability of Article 30 to a ‘University’ established before the commencement of the Constitution

a. Article 30(1) applies to educational institutions established before the commencement of the Constitution

b. There is no difference between ‘Universities’ and ‘colleges’ established before the commencement of the Constitution

c. The minority character of the institution is not ipso facto surrendered upon the incorporation of the University

d. ‘Minority’ as on the commencement of the Constitution

v. Indicia for the ‘establishment’ of a minority educational institution

vi. Impact of Entry 63 of List I on the minority status of educational institutions

vii. The decision of this Court in Prof. Yashpal

viii. The amendment of the NCMEI Act in 2010

ix. Registration under the Societies Registration Act

F.

Conclusion

1. Article 30 of the Constitution of India guarantees to religious and linguistic minorities, the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. The issues which arise for adjudication in this reference pertain to the criteria to be fulfilled to qualify as a minority educational institution for the purpose of Article 30(1) of the Indian Constitution.

A. Background

2. In 1977, the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College was established in Aligarh. The college was a teaching institution affiliated to the Calcutta University at first and subsequently to the Allahabad University. The imperial legislature passed the Aligarh Muslim University Act 1920.1 [“AMU Act”] The enactment, as the preamble indicates, “established and incorporated” Aligarh Muslim University.2 [“AMU”] The AMU Act was amended by the Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act 19513 [“1951 Amendment Act”] and Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act 1965.4 [“1965 Amendment Act”] The amendments related to the religious instructions of Muslim students5 [Section 8 was amended to stipulate that it would be unlawful for the University to adopt or impose any test of religious belief for admission or recruitment except where the religious test was made a condition for benefaction. The amended proviso to the provision stipulated that nothing in the Section shall be deemed to prevent the provision of religious instruction to those who consent to it. Section 9 which empowered the Court to mandate religious instruction for Muslim students was deleted by the amendment. Section 23(1), which provided that all members of the Court would be Muslims, was also deleted] and the administrative set-up of the university.6 [Section 23 of the AMU Act was amended to delete clauses (2) and (3). By this amendment, the powers of the Court were significantly reduced. The Court which was the supreme governing body of the University now only had the power to advise the Visitor or any other authority of the University on matters which may be referred to it for advice and exercise powers assigned to it by the Visitor. The powers of the Court were instead placed in the hands of the Executive Council. The composition of the Court (which was an all-Muslim body) was also amended. The process of constituting the Court and the Executive Council was also amended] Proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution were instituted before this Court for challenging the constitutional validity of the 1951 Amendment Act and the 1965 Amendment Act. A Constitution Bench in the decision in S. Azeez Basha v. Union of India, AIR 1968 SC 662 upheld the constitutional validity of the Amendm

                                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  4
                                  5
                                  6
                                  7
                                  8
                                  9
                                  10
                                  11
                                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                  supreme today icon
                                  logo-black

                                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                  Please visit our Training & Support
                                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                  qr

                                  Scan Me!

                                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                  whatsapp-icon Back to top