IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY K.AGRAWAL, ARVIND KUMAR VERMA
Dinesh Sahu, S/o Shri Radheshyam Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Padma Sahu, W/o Shri Dinesh Sahu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the appellant herein/plaintiff has preferred this appeal challenging the judgment & decree dated 18-1-2023 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Balodabazar in HMA No.105A/2022, by which his application for dissolution of marriage on the grounds contained in Sections 13(1)(ia) & 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act of 1955’), has been rejected finding no merit.
2. The aforesaid challenge has been made on the following factual backdrop: -
(For the sake of convenience, parties hereinafter will be referred as per their status shown and ranking given in the civil suit before the Family Court.)
2.1) The appellant herein/plaintiff filed application for dissolution of marriage with the respondent herein/defendant stating inter alia that their marriage was solemnized on 15-2-2015 at Village Raikona, Police Station Sarsiwa, under Hindu rites and customs and immediately after marriage, his wife i.e. the respondent herein resided with him for 10-11 days and thereafter proceeded to her maternal home, thus she lived with him only for 10-11 days and th



Rani Narasimha Sastry v. Rani Suneela Rani
Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State of Jharkhand
Malluru Mallappa (Dead) Through Legal Representatives v. Kuruvathappa and others
Haryana Suraj Malting Limited v. Phool Chand
Rabindra Singh v. Financial Commissioner, Cooperation, Punjab and others
Dr. N.G. Dastane v. Mrs. S. Dastane
False allegations and criminal proceedings against a spouse can constitute mental cruelty, affirming grounds for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act.
The court established that wrongful criminal allegations can constitute mental cruelty justifying a divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Husband failed to prove cruelty or desertion in divorce suit; unproved illicit relationship allegation itself constitutes cruelty to wife; appellate court upholds trial findings absent perversity, re....
False accusations and long-term separation can constitute mental cruelty, justifying divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
For a decree of divorce under cruelty or desertion, credible evidence substantiating these claims is essential. The court found no such evidence and upheld the Family Court's decision.
The institution of a false criminal complaint by a spouse can amount to mental cruelty upon the other spouse, and can be a ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Prolonged separation and absence of cohabitation constitute mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, justifying divorce.
The court affirmed that desertion and cruelty, under the Divorce Act, 1869, were established, allowing for divorce as neither party was willing to maintain the marital relationship.
Divorce grounds of adultery require high probability proof beyond suspicion; cruelty must be grave causing cohabitation impossibility; desertion needs two-year separation preceding petition. Absent p....
Grounds for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act must be substantiated by convincing evidence; mere allegations of cruelty or adultery without proof do not warrant decree of divorce.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.