HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through The Public Information Officer, Chhattisgarh – Petitioner
Versus
Chhattisgarh State Information Commission, Through Its State Information Commissioner, Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPC No. 2759 of 2025, WPC No. 2761 of 2025
Decided On : 13-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. information sought about a candidate's qualifications. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the denial of information. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on petitioner's obligations under rti. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. determination of public interest in relation to privacy. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. precedents on public interest and rti provisions. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. court's ruling on the quashing of the orders. (Para 18) |
| 7. final judgement and allowance of writ petitions. (Para 19) |
Order :
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in both writ petitions, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
Writ Petition No. 2759 of 2025
2. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission has filed this petition against the order dated 16.01.2025 passed by Chhattisgarh State Information Commission (hereinafter referred to Commission) by which S.A. bearing No. A/4396/2024/ Raigarh filed by the respondent No. 2 has been allowed and the Commission has directed the petitioner to provide information relating to the selected candidate Shailesh Kumar Patel regarding his 15 years of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 7,000 or 8 years of experience of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 8,000/-. The petitioner has also sought certified copy of the Ph.D degree of Shailendra Kumar Patel.
Writ Petition No. 2761 of 2025
3. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission has filed this petition against the order dated 27.01.2025 passed by Chhattisgarh State Information Commission (hereinafter referred to Commission) by which S.A. bearing No. A/3830/2023/ Raigarh filed by the respondent No. 2 has been allowed and the Commission has directed the petitioner to provide information relating to the selected candidate Shailesh Kumar Patel regarding his 15 years of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 7,000 or 8 years of experience of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 8,000/-. The petitioner has also sought certified copy of the Ph.D degree of Shailendra Kumar Patel.
4. Brief facts as reflected from the records of both the writ petitions in brief, are that
(a) Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to PSC) has initiated selection process for appointment of Assistant Registrar in the University wherein Dr. Shailendra Patel was selected on the aforesaid post and the respondent No. 2 was wait list candidate. The PSC after finalizing the examination has forwarded the list of selected candidate to the appointing authority/ Secretary Higher Education Department for appointment. Thereafter, respondent No.2 moved an application on 19.04.2023 wherein he has sought following information which reads as under:-
N0x0 yksd lsok vk;ksx }kjk dqylfpo] mPp f’k{kk gsrq tkjh vafre p;u ifj.kke Øekad 600@12@p;u@2021 jk;iqj fnukad 30-09-21 ds vuqlkj Jh ’kSysUnz dqekj iVsy jksy ua- 2010100003 dk p;u vU; fiNM+k oxZ esa dqylfpo ds in ij gqvk Fkk Jh ’kSysUnz dqekj iVsy }kjk lk{kkRdkj ds le; izLrqr vfuok;Z ;ksX;rk ds laca/k esa fuEufyf[kr tkudkjh iznk; djus gsrq &
¼1½ xzsM osru ¼,-th-ih-½ :i;s 7000 esa 15 o"kZ ds v/;kiu vuqHko vkdknfed xzsM osru :i;s 8000 ;k mlls vf/kd es 8 o"kZ dk vuqHko ftlesa lg izk/;kid ds :i esa v/;kiu rFkk ’kS{kf.kd iz’kklu esa vuqHko ’kkfey gSA bl izek.k i= dk izekf.kr Nk;kizfr
¼2½ okaNuh; ;ksX;rk ih-,p-Mh- dh fMxzh dh izekf.kr Nk;kizfrA mDr nLrkost dh eq>s vko’;drk gSA eSa bl vafre ifj.kke ds vuqiwjd lwph esa ’kkfey gwaA
(b) In WPC No. 2759 of 2025 the respondent No.2 has sought following information which is reads as under:-
1- NRrhlx<- yksd lsok vk;ksx ds foKkiu Øekad 10@2020@ijh{kk@fnukad 12- 121-2020 izdk’ku frfFk 23-12-2020 ,oa tkjh ’kqf) i= Øekad 02@2021@ijh{kk@fnukad 09-02-2021 }kjk foKkfir dqy lfpo ds in dh p;u izfØ;k iw.kZ djus ds Ik’pkr~ tkjh vafre p;u ifj.kke dh izfrA
2- dafMdk 1 esa mYysf[kr foKkiu ds vuqlkj dqylfpo in esa p;fur vH;fFkZ;ksa }kjk vius&vius ;ksX;rk ds leFkZu esa izLrqr lefiZr nLrkost dh izfrA \
(c) The Informat
Bihar Public Service Commission vs. Sayed Hussain Abbas Rizavi
Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Inforamtion Commission
Personal information disclosure under RTI Act requires consent; public interest must balance privacy rights.
The Right to Information Act emphasizes balancing transparency and confidentiality, ensuring procedural fairness in public recruitment information disclosure.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that personal information sought under the Right to Information Act must have a relationship to a public activity or interest and its disclosure sh....
The Court emphasized the need for a case-by-case determination of disclosure based on public interest and the distinction between 'personal information' and information relating to public activity or....
The court established that communications between public authorities regarding an employee's performance, when classified as private, do not warrant disclosure under the RTI Act if they do not relate....
The court held that mandatory procedural requirements for disclosing third-party information must be strictly followed. An appellate authority cannot bypass the mechanism for obtaining consent nor ig....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.