SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Chh) 80

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through The Public Information Officer, Chhattisgarh – Petitioner
Versus
Chhattisgarh State Information Commission, Through Its State Information Commissioner, Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPC No. 2759 of 2025, WPC No. 2761 of 2025
Decided On : 13-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shyam Sunder Lal Tekchandani, Dr. Nareshkant Chandan, in person.

Personal information disclosure under RTI Act requires consent; public interest must balance privacy rights.

Headnote:(A) Right to Information Act, 2005 - Sections 8(1)(j) and 11 - Information sought by a waiting list candidate regarding a selected candidate's experience and qualifications - The petitioner's refusal to provide information is deemed lawful as it pertains to personal information without consent - The Public Service Commission (PSC) is not the appointing authority and must respect the candidate's privacy. (Paras 4, 13-19)

(B) Public interest in relation to privacy - The court emphasized that the need for transparency must be balanced with the confidentiality of candidates' personal information, especially in examination contexts. (Paras 15-18)

Facts of the case:
The Public Service Commission refused to provide information related to a selected candidate's qualifications to a waiting list candidate, arguing it constituted personal information as per the RTI Act. The State Information Commission ordered the disclosure, leading to the PSC's petitions against these orders.

Findings of Court:
The orders of the State Information Commission were quashed, affirming the PSC's right to withhold personal information in the absence of consent from the candidate.

Issues: The key issues included whether information regarding the selected candidates could be disclosed under the RTI Act and if the PSC is required to provide such information.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the PSC could lawfully deny the request for information as Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act protects personal data unless public interest justifies disclosure. Results: Petitions allowed.

Table of Content
1. information sought about a candidate's qualifications. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the denial of information. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's analysis on petitioner's obligations under rti. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. determination of public interest in relation to privacy. (Para 13 , 14)
5. precedents on public interest and rti provisions. (Para 15 , 16)
6. court's ruling on the quashing of the orders. (Para 18)
7. final judgement and allowance of writ petitions. (Para 19)

Order :

NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.

1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in both writ petitions, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

Writ Petition No. 2759 of 2025

2. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission has filed this petition against the order dated 16.01.2025 passed by Chhattisgarh State Information Commission (hereinafter referred to Commission) by which S.A. bearing No. A/4396/2024/ Raigarh filed by the respondent No. 2 has been allowed and the Commission has directed the petitioner to provide information relating to the selected candidate Shailesh Kumar Patel regarding his 15 years of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 7,000 or 8 years of experience of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 8,000/-. The petitioner has also sought certified copy of the Ph.D degree of Shailendra Kumar Patel.

Writ Petition No. 2761 of 2025

3. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission has filed this petition against the order dated 27.01.2025 passed by Chhattisgarh State Information Commission (hereinafter referred to Commission) by which S.A. bearing No. A/3830/2023/ Raigarh filed by the respondent No. 2 has been allowed and the Commission has directed the petitioner to provide information relating to the selected candidate Shailesh Kumar Patel regarding his 15 years of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 7,000 or 8 years of experience of teaching or academic experience with grade pay of Rs. 8,000/-. The petitioner has also sought certified copy of the Ph.D degree of Shailendra Kumar Patel.

4. Brief facts as reflected from the records of both the writ petitions in brief, are that

(a) Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to PSC) has initiated selection process for appointment of Assistant Registrar in the University wherein Dr. Shailendra Patel was selected on the aforesaid post and the respondent No. 2 was wait list candidate. The PSC after finalizing the examination has forwarded the list of selected candidate to the appointing authority/ Secretary Higher Education Department for appointment. Thereafter, respondent No.2 moved an application on 19.04.2023 wherein he has sought following information which reads as under:-

N0x0 yksd lsok vk;ksx }kjk dqylfpo] mPp f’k{kk gsrq tkjh vafre p;u ifj.kke Øekad 600@12@p;u@2021 jk;iqj fnukad 30-09-21 ds vuqlkj Jh ’kSysUnz dqekj iVsy jksy ua- 2010100003 dk p;u vU; fiNM+k oxZ esa dqylfpo ds in ij gqvk Fkk Jh ’kSysUnz dqekj iVsy }kjk lk{kkRdkj ds le; izLrqr vfuok;Z ;ksX;rk ds laca/k esa fuEufyf[kr tkudkjh iznk; djus gsrq &

¼1½ xzsM osru ¼,-th-ih-½ :i;s 7000 esa 15 o"kZ ds v/;kiu vuqHko vkdknfed xzsM osru :i;s 8000 ;k mlls vf/kd es 8 o"kZ dk vuqHko ftlesa lg izk/;kid ds :i esa v/;kiu rFkk ’kS{kf.kd iz’kklu esa vuqHko ’kkfey gSA bl izek.k i= dk izekf.kr Nk;kizfr

¼2½ okaNuh; ;ksX;rk ih-,p-Mh- dh fMxzh dh izekf.kr Nk;kizfrA mDr nLrkost dh eq>s vko’;drk gSA eSa bl vafre ifj.kke ds vuqiwjd lwph esa ’kkfey gwaA

(b) In WPC No. 2759 of 2025 the respondent No.2 has sought following information which is reads as under:-

1- NRrhlx<- yksd lsok vk;ksx ds foKkiu Øekad 10@2020@ijh{kk@fnukad 12- 121-2020 izdk’ku frfFk 23-12-2020 ,oa tkjh ’kqf) i= Øekad 02@2021@ijh{kk@fnukad 09-02-2021 }kjk foKkfir dqy lfpo ds in dh p;u izfØ;k iw.kZ djus ds Ik’pkr~ tkjh vafre p;u ifj.kke dh izfrA

2- dafMdk 1 esa mYysf[kr foKkiu ds vuqlkj dqylfpo in esa p;fur vH;fFkZ;ksa }kjk vius&vius ;ksX;rk ds leFkZu esa izLrqr lefiZr nLrkost dh izfrA \

(c) The Informat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top