Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Public Information Officer Sri Sanjeet Samrendra Lakra son of Sri. Lal Mani Lakra – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against orders of state information commission (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding denial of information due to confidentiality (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. analysis of rti act and third-party information (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. specific information requests and responses by jpsc (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's reasoning on natural justice and public interest (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. conclusion quashing previous orders (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant application is directed against the order dated 13.08.2008 and 10.09.2008 passed by the Jharkhand State Information Commission in Appeal Case no. 614 of 2008. Being aggrieved from the above orders, the Petitioner-Jharkhand Public Service Commission (in short JPSC) has preferred the present writ petition praying interalia to quash the above order dated 13.08.2008 and 10.09.2008 on the ground that the learned Jharkhand State Information Commission did not provided any opportunity to the petitioner to file written statement while passing the order dated 13.08.2008 and has directed the petitioner to provide the information to respondent no. 3, without acknowledgi
The Right to Information Act emphasizes balancing transparency and confidentiality, ensuring procedural fairness in public recruitment information disclosure.
Personal information disclosure under RTI Act requires consent; public interest must balance privacy rights.
Disclosure of marks in public recruitment processes under RTI promotes transparency and accountability, outweighing privacy concerns, reinforcing public trust in selection integrity.
The court upheld the State Information Commission's order to disclose parts of the Justice K. Hema Committee Report, emphasizing public interest over privacy concerns under the RTI Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that personal information sought under the Right to Information Act must have a relationship to a public activity or interest and its disclosure sh....
The court established that communications between public authorities regarding an employee's performance, when classified as private, do not warrant disclosure under the RTI Act if they do not relate....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
