SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Chh) 121

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, CJ., RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, J.
Kamalnarayan Sahu, S/o. Late Jagluram – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through P.S.  Daundilohara, District Balod (C.G.) - Respondent
CRA No. 371 of 2024, CRA No. 670 of 2024
Decided On : 02-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Ms. Aditi Singhvi, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Swarnakar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate

Circumstantial evidence, including reliable DNA findings, can substantiate convictions in serious crimes even without eyewitness testimony.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 450, 302, 376, 120B - Homicide and sexual violence prosecution - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence and DNA analysis established the guilt of the accused, affirming the trial court's judgment of 25.01.2024. (Paras 3, 24, 64, 80)

(B) DNA Evidence - Its reliability and compliance with collection protocols are pivotal; even in the absence of eyewitnesses, conclusive DNA matches can support convictions in circumstantial cases. (Paras 72, 75)

(C) Relationship and Motive - Long-term acquaintance with the victim provides circumstantial context, establishing potential grounds for involvement in the crime despite the absence of direct motive. (Paras 78, 79)

Facts of the case:
The appeals arise from the conviction of the appellants for the murder and rape of the victim, whose death was determined as homicides by asphyxiation, with supporting DNA evidence linking the accused to the scene. (Paras 1, 82)

Findings of Court:
The appeal court upheld the trial court's finding of guilt, emphasizing the weight of DNA evidence corroborating the conviction. (Paras 80, 83)

Issues: Whether the evidence meets the legal standards of reliability and sufficiency to establish guilt in the absence of direct evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: A conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence when it forms a complete chain of circumstances excluding all reasonable hypotheses of innocence. (Paras 62, 76)

Result: Both appeals dismissed, affirming the conviction under applicable sections of the IPC.

Judgment :

Ramesh Sinha, CJ.

1. Since both the above-captioned appeals arise out of a common incident and common factual matrix, this Court is disposing of both these appeals by a common judgment.

2. Both these criminal appeals have been filed by the accused/appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the CrPC’) against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 25.01.2024 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge / FTC, Balod, District – Balod (C.G.) in Sessions Case No. 04/2022, by which the appellants have been convicted and sentenced in the following manner :-

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 12.06.2021, the deceased/victim's brother-in-law (HkkbZ cgw) who was her neighbor, filed a written report at the Doondilhora police station stating that she had an 8th-grade education and worked in the household and agriculture. On 12.06.2021, she went to the field at 5:00 a.m. to fill water from the borewell for her home. By the time she returned, it was 6:00 a.m. Her neighbor, the deceased/victim, who usually woke up at 5:00-6:00 a.m., had not woken up. She knocked on her door two or three times, calling out, "Didi-Didi", but when she didn't wake up, she pushed the door open. It was locked from the inside. She wondered why the deceased/victim hadn't woken up, and went to her sister-in-law in the neighborhood and told her that the deceased/victim had still not woken up. Afterward, they knocked on the victim's door again, but she didn't open it. They peered through the hole in the door and saw the victim's neck and head lying on the bed, asleep. She then let her younger daughter in through a small broken curtain at the back of the house. Then her daughter went inside and unlocked the door. By then, Laleshwari and Uttarabai had also arrived. When they all went inside the room, they saw that the deceased/victim was lying face down on the cot. She was bare of clothing below her waist. Her nightgown had slipped from her waist. The deceased/victim had suffered injuries to her face and neck. Blood oozed from her mouth. Both hands were tied behind her back with a towel. Everyone called out to the deceased/victim, but she remained silent. She had died. An unknown person had entered the house between 6:00 PM on 11.06.2021 and 6:00 AM on 12.06.2021, murdered the deceased/victim, and then fled.

4. On the above information, the Doondilhora police station registered the rural intimation and rural complaint crime and registered the information register number- 31/2020 of untimely and accidental death and took the case into investigation panchnama proceedings. During the inquest, after preparing the map of the incident spot and giving notice to the witnesses, the inquest over the dead body of the deceased/victim was prepared and to know the exact cause of death, the post-mortem of the dead body of the deceased/victim was done, in which the doctor found the death of the deceased/victim to be of "homicidal in nature”, then the Doondilhora police station registered a case bearing Crime No. 0106/2021 against unknown persons and the case was taken up for investigation.

5. During the investigation, the deceased's vaginal slide, her clothes, and blood sample were preserved and sent to the FSL in Raipur for chemical testing. The report revealed the presence of human semen in the slide and swab, leading to the addition of Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. During the investigation, it was learned that the deceased/victim had been in a relationship with the accused, Kamalnarayan Sahu, for 10-12 years, a fact known to the villagers. On the date of the incident, some villagers saw the accused, Kamlesh Kumar Shrivas and Uttam Kumar Raote, wandering towards the deceased/victim's house at night, arousing suspicion. Based on this suspicion, the accused were questioned. Blood samples were taken from the accused, and the semen found on the vaginal slide was subjected to DNA testing.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top