SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Chh) 131

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, CJ.
Rahul Kurre S/o Late Prahlad Kurre – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
MCRC No. 677 of 2026
Decided On : 19-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kanhiya Ram Yadav
For the Respondent: Sourabh Sahu

Bail can be granted considering the duration of custody and pending trial, provided that the applicant complies with specified conditions, including attending court.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 34(2) and 59(a) - Bail application under the Excise Act - Applicant arrested for possession of 15 liters of illicit liquor - Charge-sheet filed; applicant argues false implication and seeks bail citing duration in custody - Prosecutor highlights prior criminal antecedents, including one under the Excise Act - Court allows bail considering the time required for trial conclusions - Conditions for bail include presence on court dates and prohibition on adjournments. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Bail - Conditions in granting bail, including the requirement of undertaking and repercussions of misuse - Court outlines consequences for non-compliance with bail conditions. (Paras 7)

(C) Criminal law - Consideration of the gravity of allegations and previous convictions related to the applicant's case. (Para 6)

Table of Content
1. background of the bail application and arrest details. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented for and against bail. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning leading to bail decision. (Para 5 , 6)
4. conditions and orders for bail release. (Para 7)
5. final order for compliance and information. (Para 8)

ORDER :

1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 90/2025, registered at Police Station – Excise Circle, Nagri, District – Dhamtari (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) and 59(a) of C.G. Excise Act.

2. The case of the prosecution, is that on 20.11.2025, the Sub-Inspector, Excise Circle - Nagari received a secret information during the patrolling. On the basis of secret information, Excise Circle conducted a raid in the residential house of the present applicant, whereby the present applicant was found to be in possession of 15 bulk liters illicit handmade country Mahua liquor. The present applicant was arrested, hence this bail application.

3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and there are four criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, and same are mentioned in the bail application at paragraph No.4(a). It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. The applicant is in jail since 20.11.2025 and trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there are four criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, out of which one case is under the Excise Act, which is disposed of and the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. It is further submitted that a total of 15 liters of Mahua liquor has been seized from the possession of the present applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant and he is in jail since 20.11.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application.

7. Let applicant, Rahul Kurre, involved in Crime No.90/2025, registered at Police Station – Excise Circle, Nagri, , District – Dhamtari (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) and 59(a) of C.G. Excise Act., be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top