Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Soumitra Paul – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. financial discrimination due to retrospective pay adjustments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on natural justice and legitimate expectation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14) |
| 3. requests for restoration of increments and proper pay fixation. (Para 19 , 21) |
| 4. petitioner's legal framework and grievances against the respondents. (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. court's direction for compliance with statutory provisions. (Para 44 , 45) |
JUDGMENT :
ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.
1. The petitioners, who are presently discharging duties in the posts of Constable and Head Constable under the Railway Protection Force (RPF), Metro Railway, Kolkata, function under the supervisory jurisdiction of the Inspector General-cum-Chief Security Commissioner, RPF, Eastern Railway. The petitioners assert that they have been subjected to a continuous financial disadvantage owing to arbitrary and retrospective interpretation of pay fixation norms by the respondent Railway authorities.
2. It had been the emphatic grievance of the petitioners, upon their initial appointment, they were extended the benefit of two advance increments in accordance with the recommendations of the 4th Central Pay Commission (CPC). These
Retrospective withdrawal of accrued financial benefits under the 5th CPC without proper legislative authority violates principles of natural justice and the rule of law, affecting vested rights and e....
The proper interpretation of pay fixation rules under FR 22-B and associated rulings dictates that prior option exercised by a government servant must be adhered to, ensuring benefits are computed co....
Employees are entitled to pay protection on transfer even if the probation period is not completed, and pay reductions without notice violate natural justice.
Service Law - Scale of pay - In view of amendment of ROP,1999 by Fifth Amendment insofar as our case is concerned, this subsequent amendment under Eighteenth Amendment Rules did not have any further ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
