IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
AKIL KURESHI, S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY, JJ.
Nabendu Bhattacherjee. S/o- Lt, Dakshina Rn. Bhattacharjee – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tripura – Respondent
WP(C) No. 635 of 2017, WA No. 37 of 2017
Decided on : 19-04-2021
Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1999 – Rule 10 – Benefit of CAS-1 – Writ appeal arises out of a judgment passed by Single Judge in W.P(C) – Appellants- original petitioners were appointed as Lower Division Assistant-cum-Typist in General Administrative Department, Government of Tripura in the scale of pay of Rs.3300 - 7100/-. – Upon completion of 10(ten) years of service withoutpromotion, they were entitled to benefit of CAS-1 in terms of Rule 10(d) of Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1999 – Their pay was fixed in next higher scale of Rs.4,000 - 7890/- by applying provision of FR 22(I)(a)(i) – It appears that said FR was amended by Government ofIndia under notification – In order to align this fundamental rule with amendments of Government of India, State of Tripura also issued a notification promulgating fundamental (Tripura Amendment) Rules, 1999.
Finding of the court: Under Eighteenth amendment to ROP, 1999 it was further clarified that at the time of granting CAS benefit to an employee the pay fixation would be carried out in terms of substituted FR22 (I)(a)(2) and that this amendment itself would be brought into w.e.f. 01.01.1996 – In view of the amendment of ROP,1999 by Fifth Amendment insofar as our case is concerned, this subsequent amendment under Eighteenth Amendment Rules did not have any further significant impact – Writ appeal therefore, must fail – In writ petition, the challenge to the Rules will fail, so also challenge to the modification in pay fixation – Petitioner shall also be protected against the recoveries of the past overpayments of salary.
Result: Proceedings Disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Akil Kureshi, J.
The writ appeal and the writ petition are inter connected. They have been heard together and would be disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Brief facts are as under:
3. It appears that the said FR was amended by the Government of India under the notification dated 30th August, 1989. In order to align this fundamental rule with the amendments of Government of India, State of Tripura also issued a notification dated 3rd October, 1999 promulgating fundamental (Tripura Amendment) Rules, 1999 (hereinafter to be referred to as Amendment Rules, 1999). By these Rules FR 22(I) now had sub rule (a)(1) and (2). In the amended form FR 22(I) (a)(2) reads as under:
Provided that where the minimum pay of the time-scale of the new post is higher than his pay in respect of the post held by him regularly, he shall draw the minimum as the initial pay:
Provided further that in a case where pay is fixed at the same stage, he shall continue to draw that pay until such time as he would have received an increment in that time-scale of the old post, in cases where pay is fixed at the higher stage; he shall get his next increment on completion of the period when an increment is earned in the time-scale of the new post.
On appointment on regular basis to such a new post, other that to an ex-cadre post on deputation, the Government servant shall have the option, to be exercised within one month from the date of such appointment, for fixation of his pay in the new post with effect from the date of appointment to the new post or with effect from the date of increment in the old post.”
4. This Rule was given retrospective effect from 1.1.1996. It may be noted that ROP, 1999 under which pay and allowances to the employees of the State Government were revised, were brought into force with effect from 1.1.1996 also.
5. All the original petitioners upon completion of 10 years of service without promotion were granted the benefit of CAS-1 after 03.10.1999 but by applying the pre revised FRs and accordingly their pay was fixed, as noted earlier, in the next higher scale of Rs.4,000 - 7890/- from the existing scale of Rs.3300 - 7100/- in which till then they were drawing their pay and allowances.
6. Under the notification dated 24.03.2000 the Government of Tripura promulgated Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pay) (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 1999 (hereinafter to be referred to as ROP, 1999 Amendment Rules). Under these Rules it was provided that substituted FR 22(I) (a)(1) shall be applicable in cases of promotion for appointment to another post with higher or the same scale provided such posts carry duties and responsibilities of greater importance than those attached to the post held by the employee before promotion. This Rule further provided that:
State of Punjab and Others etc. v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc. reported in AIR 2015 SC 696
S.S. Bola and others Vrs. B.D. Sardana and others
Chairman, Railway Board and others Vrs. C.R. Rangadhamaiah and others
Service Law - Scale of pay - In view of amendment of ROP,1999 by Fifth Amendment insofar as our case is concerned, this subsequent amendment under Eighteenth Amendment Rules did not have any further ....
The proper interpretation of pay fixation rules under FR 22-B and associated rulings dictates that prior option exercised by a government servant must be adhered to, ensuring benefits are computed co....
The court determined that erroneous pay fixation claims are continuous wrongs, allowing for revision regardless of delayed action on behalf of the employee.
Merger of Section Officer and AAO pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.2006 entitles seniors promoted pre-date to minimum of merged scale for 6th CPC fixation at Rs.13,950 + GP 4800, overriding prior pay differen....
Employees are entitled to pay protection on transfer even if the probation period is not completed, and pay reductions without notice violate natural justice.
In the matters of this kind the approach is not go entirely on the issue of the lapses and delay but to examine the merits. It is with that approach that this Court has required the Opposite Parties ....
The arbitrary introduction of a cut-off date affecting an employee's entitlement to a promotional pay scale was held to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.