SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 547

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, CJ., BIBHU DATTA GURU , J.
Union of India Through National Investigation Agency – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Tati, S/o. Masa Tati – Respondent
CRA No. 551 of 2025
Decided On : 02-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. B.Gopa Kumar and Mr. Himanshu Pandey, Advocates

Court clarified the procedure for granting pardon to accomplices under Section 306 Cr.P.C., emphasizing its critical role in prosecuting serious offenses while ensuring adherence to legal standards.

Headnote:(A) National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - Section 6(4)(5), 343 (306 Cr.P.C) - Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act, 2005 - Section 8(1)(3)(5) - Application for pardon - NIA's request under Section 306(1) Cr.P.C. for granting pardon to an accomplice was rejected by the trial court citing non-compliance with legal provisions - Court clarified conditions under Section 306 for grant of pardon and emphasized the necessity to consider acquiesced evidence in heinous crimes - Application rejected was unnecessarily bureaucratic, without adequate examination of evidence - Remanded for re-consideration. (Paras 4, 5, 17, 18)

(B) Pardon principles - Court emphasized precedent ensuring cooperation of accomplices in cases with severe implications for national security and reiterated civic duty to address such serious allegations appropriately. (Paras 6, 12)

Facts of the case:
The appeal arises from the NIA's effort to obtain a pardon for an accomplice involved in a crime related to a seized sum of Rs. Ten Lakh, linking the accused to a banned terrorist organization. The NIA sought to allow the accomplice to provide testimony to assist in prosecution.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's abrupt rejection of the NIA's application for pardon was deemed illegal due to a failure to heed relevant statutory provisions on pardon and the importance of cooperation in serious offenses.

Issues: The primary issue is whether the trial court appropriately interpreted and applied Section 306 Cr.P.C. regarding the conditions for granting pardon to an accomplice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found the learned trial court erred in its application of the law regarding tendering pardon, stating it requires a proper examination of facts and not merely a mechanical refusal based on a misinterpretation of conditions.

Result: Appeal allowed; matter remanded for reconsideration.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the trial court's rejection of the application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court observations on the application of section 306 and relevant case law. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 17)
4. ratio decidendi concerning the role of accomplice testimony. (Para 12 , 16)
5. conclusion and order remanding the matter for reconsideration. (Para 18 , 19)

Judgment :

Ramesh Sinha , CJ.

1. Heard Mr. B.Gopa Kumar and Mr. Himanshu Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant / Union of India.

2. As per the office report dated 21.04.2025, it transpires that the notice has been served to the respondent on 29.03.2025 and the matter has been taken up today, but on behalf of the respondent, no counsel is present to contest the present appeal filed by the Union of India, hence Court proceeds to hear the matter.

3. The appeal is preferred by the appellant against the order dated 07.02.2025, passed by the learned NIA Special Court, Jagdalpur refusing the application filed under Section 306(1) of Cr.P.C. (343 of the BNSS) for grant of permissions to tender pardon to one of the accused persons-cum-surrendered naxal.

4. Brief facts of the case are that a crime was registered on 16/06/2023 by the Kotwali Police Station, District Bijapur having Crime No. 68/2023 under Section 8(1)(3) (5) of Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act 2005.The allegations inscribed therein in the report in brief are that the Kotwali Police had arrested one person, Dinesh Tati, Son of- Masa Tati, resident of Palnar, PS Gangalur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh. During personal search, a black colour bag containing Rs. Ten Lakh (Rs. 2000x500) notes was found to be kept in yellow polythene cover, one pass book, 80 naxal pamphlets, and some medicines which were seized. Upon examination of the said accused Dinesh Tati, he revealed that he had received the said amount of Rs. Ten Lakhs from a Surrendered Naxal (named 'A' as mentioned by the Hon'ble Court of Special Judge, Jagdalpur), Shanti Hemla (Area Committee Member), Pandru Pottam (Area Commander in Chief), all belonging to proscribed terrorist organization CPI (Maoist). Further the above accused persons told Dinesh Tati to purchase a tractor out of this money from John Deer Tractor at showroom Majiguda, Bijapur, Chhattisgarh and while returning he was directed to go to Kandulanar and hand over the 80 Naxal pamphlets to Venkat @ Vishwanath, Bhopalpatnam Local Organization Squad Commander of Madded Area Committee. Subsequent to that later on, during the course of investigation by the state police Sec 10, 13 (1)(2), 39,40 of UA(P) Act 1967 were also invoked.

The Central Government had received information regarding registration of F.I.R. No.68/2023 dated 16/06/2023 at Kotwali Police Station, District Bijapur. Subsequent to the above turn of events, the Central Government was of the view that Scheduled Offence under the NIA Act, 2008 has been committed and giving full regard to the gravity of the offences and security ramifications, it was found to be necessary that the offence need to be investigated by the National Investigation Agency in accordance with the provisions of NIA Act 2008. In pursuance of the opinion formed thus by Central Government, an order was issued exercising power under Section 6(4)(5) read with Section 8 of NIA Act 2008 on 27/03/2024 to take over the matter.

In furtherance to the above order of the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, (CTCR Division), New Delhi Order no 11011/35/2024/NIA dated 04/03/2024 and 27/03/2024, the NIA has re-registered the said F.I.R. as RC No.- 17/2024/NIA/RPR on 04/04/2024.

The appellant is a Central Government Agency established by the Indian Government at the National level to investigate and prosecute offences affecting the sovereignty, security, integrity as well as economic security of the country. It has been established after the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks as need for a Central Agency to combat ter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top