SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 555

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, C.J.
Ramesh Kumar, S/o Sambhu Ram Kachlam - Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
CRA No. 1120 of 2022
Decided On : 15-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer

The conviction under the POCSO Act was upheld due to overwhelming medical and DNA evidence, despite the victim's hostile testimony.

Headnote:(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 3 and 4 - Criminal Appeal - Conviction of a minor child - Accused convicted for penetrative sexual assault resulting in a stillbirth - Evidence includes medical examination and DNA results - Testimony of the victim upheld despite contradictions due to hostile witness status - Conviction affirmed due to overwhelming evidence against the accused. (Paras 3, 24, 30)

(B) Judicial proceedings - Hostile witnesses - Evidence not to be discarded in toto - Portions corroborated by reliable evidence can be considered without exclusion. (Paras 26, 30)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for sexually assaulting a 16-year-old girl, resulting in a stillbirth. The crime occurred when the victim was alone at home, and the accused threatened her to prevent disclosure. Medical evidence confirmed the pregnancy and stillbirth following the assault.

Findings of Court:
Conviction under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act upheld; evidence, including the DNA report, established the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues: Whether the victim's testimony and absence of supporting witnesses affect the prosecution's case against the accused?

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the scientific evidence substantiated the prosecution's claim against the accused, outweighing the victim's recantation during trial. The victim's hostility does not negate the credibility of proven facts.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. hearing on application for bail and suspension of sentence. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual account of the crime and trial proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments of both the appellant and the prosecution. (Para 7 , 8)
4. court analysis of evidence and testimony. (Para 9 , 10)
5. validation of evidence despite witness hostility. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. legal principles on the impact of hostile witnesses. (Para 26 , 29)
7. final conclusion and orders of the court. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

Ramesh Sinha, C.J.

1. Though, today the present appeal has been listed for hearing on I.A. No.1 of 2022, which is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail, however with the consent of learned counsel for the parties and considering the period of detention of the appellant, the appeal is heard finally.

2. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2022 stands disposed of.

3. This criminal appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.04.2022 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO), Balod, District Balod, (C.G.), in Special Session Case Pocso No. 85/2018, whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter called as “POCSO”) and sentenced to undergo RI for 07 years and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for 06 months.

4. The case of the prosecution is that the complainant/victim lives in village Talgaon, Police Station and District Balod, Chhattisgarh. At the time of the incident, she was studying in class 12th. The accused, Ramesh Katlam, is a resident of her village and lives in her neighborhood. A year ago, when she used to go to school, the accused used to meet her there and say that he loved her and would marry her. However, she always refused. Even then, the accused used to harass her repeatedly. On 27.01.2018, her younger brother was studying at his maternal grandparents' house in village Belaudi, her parents had gone to see him, leaving her alone at home. At around 10:00 pm, the accused came to her house, pushed her inside, locked the door, and said he would kill her and defame her. He pulled her into the room and forcibly had physical relations with her. He threatened her that if she told anyone about this, he would defame her, which scared her. After that, whenever her parents were not at home, the accused used to come to her house and have physical relations with her 4-5 times against her will by threatening her that he would defame her. On 15.08.2018, she started having severe stomach pain. Her parents admitted her to Upadhyay Nursing Home, Dhamtari, at around 3:00 pm. there she delivered a 7 months old dead baby. Dr. Rashmi Upadhyay (PW-04) of Upadhyay Nursing Home, Dhamtari, gave a written complaint to Dhamtari Police Station. Based on Dr. Rashmi Upadhyay's written information and the victim's statement, Assistant Inspector Gayatri Sinha (PW-7) registered a First Information Report against the accused under Sections 457, 342, 376, 376(2)¼<½, and 506 (Part II) of the IPC and Section 5¼B½@6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, in Crime No. 283/2018. After completion of investigation, the police at Balod, District Balod, found evidence of the crime against the accused and presented the charge-sheet in court for trial on 28.09.2018.

5. The trial Court has framed charges against the appellant as mentioned above. The appellant abjured his guilt and pleaded innocence.

6. In order to prove the guilt of the accused/appellant, the prosecution has produced as many as 08 witnesses, victim (PW-1), the victim’s father (PW-2), Head Master Tokanlal (PW-3), Dr. Rashmi Upadhyay (PW-4), Dr. D.S. Dev (PW-5), Dr. Jitendra Kumar (PW- 6), Inspector Mrs. Gayatri Sinha (PW-7), and Inspector Ramkinkar Yadav (PW-8). The statement of the appellant under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. was also recorded in which he denied the material appearing against him and stated th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top