SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 430

MUKUL MUDGAL, DEVENDER GUPTA
HARI CHAND – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GITA LUTHRA, OM PRAKASH AGRAWAL

Devinder Gupta

( 1 ) THIS judgment is meant to dispose of these group of appeals filed under Section 54 of the land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") since they arise out of same award of the Collector Land Acquisition.

( 2 ) A big chunk of land situate within Revenue estate of village Tughlakabad was notified for being acquired, at public expense for public purpose, namely Planned Development of Delhi through notification issued under Sections 4 and 17 (1) of the Act on 1. 6. 1992. It was followed by declaration under Section 6 of the Act made on 29. 7. 1992. As Section 17 (1) of the Act was invoked, compliance of Section 5a of the Act was waived off. Actual physical possession of the land admittedly had already been taken over on 4. 7. 1988.

( 3 ) PURSUANT to notices issued under Sections 9 and 10 (1) of the Act claims were invited. The collector Land Acquisition on 17. 5. 1994 made his award No. 4/94-95 offering amount of compensation to the claimants at the rate of Rs. 118. 00 per sq. yard as against the claim of Rs. 5,000. 00 per sq. yard. Feeling dissatisfied references were sought by the claimants. The Reference Court through the impugned awards det






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top