SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 382

MUKUL MUDGAL, DEVENDER GUPTA
BEDI RAM – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
OM PRAKASH AGRAWAL, SANJAY PODDAR

Devinder Gupta

( 1 ) THESE appeals have been preferred under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") seeking determination of the amount of compensation payable to the claimants whose lands situate in village Kondii, Delhi were acquired through two separate Notifications issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act on 8. 2. 1973 and 19. 8. 1976.

( 2 ) UNDER the general notification issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Act, on 13. 11. 1959 considerable land situate at village Kondii, Delhi was acquired for public purpose, namely. Planned Development of Delhi. Land was also acquired for Planned Development of Delhi in the adjoining villages, Dallupura, mandaoli Fazalpur, Karkardoma, Khureji-Khas, Khichripur, Ghazipur etc. In RFA no. 128/82 (Om Prakash v. Union of India) decided on 11. 4. 1991 by this Court for village Kondii the claimants whose lands were acquired through Notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act on 13. 11. 1959 were held entitled to compensation at the rate of Rs. 8. 064/- per bigha irrespective of the classification of land.

( 3 ) FOR the lands situate at village Chilla Saroda Bangar acquired through notifica
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top