High Court Of Delhi
RAHUL DHAKA VIKAS SOCIETY - Appellant
Versus
GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPARSTHA UNIVERSITY - Respondent
Civil Writ 6227 of 2000
Decided On : 12/21/2000
NCTE Act - Recognition and Affiliation - Section 14, Section 16
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a society running an institute offering B. Ed. courses, sought affiliation with a university after being granted recognition by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). The university refused affiliation, leading to the question of whether the university was obligated to grant affiliation after NCTE recognition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while NCTE recognition is a prerequisite for offering teacher education, the university has the discretion to grant or refuse affiliation. The university's refusal was based on valid grounds and was held to be legal and valid.
Issues: The main issue was whether the university was obligated to grant affiliation after NCTE recognition.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that NCTE recognition is necessary for offering teacher education, but the university has the discretion to grant or refuse affiliation. The university's refusal must be based on valid grounds and must be done fairly and in accordance with the principles of natural justice.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was ordered to pay the university's costs. The court clarified that the petitioner could reapply for affiliation in the future, and the university should consider the application objectively and in accordance with the law.
( 1 ) THIS petition raises interesting question of law. Petitioner No. 1 is the society registered under the Societies Registration Act which is running petitioner No. 2 named v. D. Institute of Technology . It is conducting B. Ed. Courses. The National Institute for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as ncte Act ) was passed by the Parliament with the main objective to provide for the establishment of a National Council for Teacher Education with a view to achieving planned and co-ordinated development of the teacher education system throughout the country, the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the teacher education system and for matters connected therewith. As per the provisions of this Act, any institution offering course or training in teacher education is required to seek recognition under this Act. The petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the institute ) applied for grant of recognition under the said Act by making appropriate application and the recognition has been granted by Regional Committee of the National Council for Teacher Education (hereafter referred to as council ). Petitioner also wanted affiliation with Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (hereinafter referred to as the university ). This was provisionally given earlier for the year 1999-2000. However, the University has refused to continue this affiliation for the Session 2000-2001. The institute claims that once it has been granted recognition by NCTE i. e. , respondent No. 2, the University cannot refuse affiliation and has challenged the impugned communication dated 22/08/2000 by the University refusing to give affiliation. It is in this context that following question of law has fallen for consideration.
( 2 ) WHETHER it is obligatory on the part of the University (or the examining body) to grant affiliation to an institution where recognition has been granted to such institution by the Council.
( 3 ) AT this stage it would be appropriate to scan through the portentous events which have led to this controversy. In May, 1999 petitioner No. 1 Society was given no objection by the Government of Delhi for setting up an institution to run B. Ed. course in the NCT of Delhi. Thereafter, Institute applied for recognition under Section 14 (1) of the NCTE Act. By order dated 6/09/1999 Northern Regional Committee, NCTE granted recognition to the Institute for B. Ed. one-year course for academic year 1999-2000 with annual in take of 60 students. The Institute thereafter submitted proposal of affiliation to University for conduct of B. Ed. of one year duration. On this Vice-Chancellor constituted an Estimate Committee comprising of 3 officers, (2 from Delhi University and a Deputy Registrar of its own University ). Thereafter the University addressed letter dated 11/10/1999 to the Institute conveying the provisional affiliation of the Institute. This was conveyed in terms of Section 5 (21) of the Indraprastha Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1998. Number of conditions were, however, mentioned subject to which provisional affiliation was given. In this manner students admitted by the Institute to B. Ed. course completed the course and took the examination conducted by University. It is the claim of the Institute that all the 60 students passed the said examination and 48 students out of these secured first division.
( 4 ) ON 12/01/2000 University wrote a letter to the Institute asking it to deposit Rs. 10,000. 00 as processing fee to consider the continuation of provisional affiliation for the year 2000-01. Review Committee of the University visited the Institute on 4/02/2000 to monitor and evaluate the implementation of B. Ed. programme and based on that letter dated 14/03/2000 was written to the Institute informing various deficiencies which were noted. Taking serious view of the matter. University by the letter, advised the Institute to remove the deficiencies and fulfil terms and conditions of affiliatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.