B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
B. K. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the action of the respondents in not permitting him to proceed on voluntary retirement from Army service towards the end of 1998 or early 1999 and the action of the respondents in shifting him from Delhi to outside. The petitioner wants to be in Delhi till he is permitted voluntary retirement from service. The main grounds on which the petitioner seeks relief are that he comes under low medical category, that he was already superseded because of his being a low medical category, that he had already worked in Wireless Experimental Centre from November, 1989 to March, 1992 and he is entitled to continue in Delhi in Wireless Experimental Centre which,. according to him, is the Headquarters of the entire department.
( 2 ) THE Petitioner has filed Annexure P-1 which is the proceedings of the Medical Board. In this the percentage of disability is shown as composite 40%. His condition is to be reviewed on 24. 7. 1996. The Medical Board has expressed the view that he is primary hypertension patient, fit for military duties in plains, including foot hills upto 2500 ft. Specialist facilities available in station
REFERRED TO : National Insurance Co. Ltd. New Delhi v. Jugal Kishore and Others
Col. Prithipal Singh Bedi v.Union of India and Ors.
Ex. Major N.R. Ajwani and Ors. v. Union of India
Surjit Singh v. State of Punjab
D.S. Nakara and Others v. Union of India
Common Cause v. Union of India
B. Prabhakar v. State of Andhra
REFERRED : Union of India and Others v. Lt. Col. P.S. Bhargava
Delhi Transport Corp. v. D.T.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.