( 1 ) THESE- two appeals provide an opportunity for construing the nature of the orders passed in civil suits by the learned Single Judges sitting on the Original Side when the orders would amount to judgment within the meaning of Section 10 (1) of Delhi High Court Act, 1966 so as to make appeals thereagainst maintainable.

( 2 ) IN FAO (OS) 56/96 an application filed under Order 19 Rule 2 Civil Procedure Code seeking cross-examination on affidavits filed by the opposite party in the course of proceedings under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1939 has been rejected by the order impugned. We must place on record our appreciation of the fairness of learned counsel for the appellant - Mr. P. L. Aggarwal, advocate, who faced with the challenge to the maintainability of appeal filed by him brought out and placed before the Court several decisions rendered by Delhi High Court, whether they favoured his viewpoint or not. That is what is expected from a counsel, an officer of the Court, discharging his duty towards the court, as paramount as his duty towards the client.

( 3 ) FAO (OS) 61/96 is directed against an order allowing an application under Order 11 Rule