SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Del) 250

D.R.KHANNA, RAJINDAR SACHAR
BIRLA COTTON SPINNING AND WEAVINGMILLS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


SACHAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS group of petitions were heard together. All of them are directed against the respective orders of Respondent, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposing damages under Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter to be called Act ). Many of the points raised are common and will stand decided in all the petitions by the decision given in one of the petition. We shall however deal with each petition separately, also.

( 2 ) SECTION 5 of 1952 Act empowers the Central Government to frame a scheme to be called Employees Provident Fund Scheme for the establishment of Provident Funds under the Act,. . . and there shall be established, after the framing of a scheme a Fund. Section 6 of the 1952 Act provides for payment of contributions by the employer to the Fund of six and a quarter percent of the basic wages payable to the employee and employee s contribution, which shall be equal to the contribution payable by the employer in respect of him. Section 2 (h) of the Act defines "fund" to mean the Provident Fund established under a Scheme.

( 3 ) EMPLOYEE s Provident Fund Scheme 1952 was published on 2nd September, 1































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top