SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Del) 70

B.C.MISRA
DEVI DAYAL TEXTILE COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
NANDLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.Patney, V.P.DEVAN

B. C. MISRA

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed by the defendants under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against" the order of the Sub-Judge, dated 27th January, 1973, setting aside the dismissal of the suit.

( 2 ) THE material facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. On 27th January, 1973, none appeared for the plaintiff, while the counsel for the defendants was present, and the court dismissed the suit in default of appearance. On the same date the court suo moto recalled its order on the ground that the case was really fixed for 8th February, 1973 for obtaining the specimen signatures of the defendant and as such it could not be dismissed on 27th January, 1973 and so the order was recalled, and notice was issued to the defendants. The counsel for the defendants has challenged the subsequent order of the court and has contended that the court had no jurisdiction to recall the order under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure without an application of the-plaintiff under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code for setting aside the dismissal.

( 3 ) MR. Patney, counsel for the respondent, has contended that originally 27th January, 1973 was fixed as the date for recordi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top